My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
080017V000
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
DayForward
>
1100
>
080017V000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2010 10:11:43 AM
Creation date
5/18/2007 12:35:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
335
County
Arapahoe
Douglas
Community
Littleton
Basin
South Platte
Title
FIS - Littleton
Date
9/29/1989
Prepared For
Littleton
Prepared By
FEMA
Floodplain - Doc Type
Current FEMA Regulatory Floodplain Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />3.2 Hydraulic Analyses <br /> <br />Analyses of the hydraulic characteristics of flooding from the <br />sources studied were carried out to provide estimates of the <br />elevations of floods of the selected recurrence intervals. <br /> <br />Locations of selected cross sections used in the hydraulic analyses <br />are shown on the Flood Profiles (Exhibit 1). For stream segments <br />where a floodway was computed (Section 4.2), selecied cross section <br />locations are also shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Map <br />(Exhibit 2). <br /> <br />Channel roughness factors (Manning's "n") for the hydraulic <br />computations were assigned on the basis of field inspection of the <br />floodplain areas and engineering judgment. Likewi se, bridge and <br />culvert coefficients used in computations were assigned on the <br />basis of field inspections of structures and engineering judgment. <br /> <br />Flood profiles were drawn showing computed water-surface elevations <br />to an accuracy of 0.5 foot for floods of the selected recurrence <br />intervals (Exhibit 1). <br /> <br />Lee Gulch and Little5Creek cross sections were field-surveyed and <br />located at close intervals above and below bridges and culverts in <br />order to compute the effects of backwater. For Big Dry Creek and <br />Slaughterhouse Gulch, cross sections were taken from detailed <br />topographic maps (References 6 and 13). Oetai led mapping of the <br />South Platte was secured from the COE. The USGS topographic <br />mapping at a scale of 1:24,000, with a contour interval of 10 feet, <br />was used with the field survey data (Reference 14). <br /> <br />As a result of the channel improvement project for the reach of <br />Little's Creek downstream from the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe <br />and the Denver and Rio Grande Western railroads to its confluence <br />wi th the South Plat te Ri ver, the IOO-year base flood would be <br />contained wi thin the channel. The hydraul ic reanalysi s for this <br />reach of Little's Creek was performed by Love and Associates, Inc., <br />in January 1989 (Reference 28). <br /> <br />Water-surface elevations of floods of the .sele-cted recurrenee <br />intervals were computed through the use of the COE HEC-2 Water- <br />Surfa~e Profile computer program (Reference 12). Starting <br />elevations for the tributaries of South Platte River were taken <br />from previously computed stage-discharge relationships when <br />available. In many cases, control elevations were shifted upstream <br />to bridges or .cui verts. Where no other information or control <br />structures were available, the starting water-surface elevations <br />were computed by the slope-area method option of the HEC-2 program. <br /> <br />The hydraulic analyses for this study were based on unobstructed <br />flow. The flood elevations shown on the profiles are thus <br />considered valid only if hydraulic structures remain unobstructed, <br />operate properly, and do not fail. <br /> <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.