Laserfiche WebLink
<br />flood which equals or exceeds the 100-year flood (1 percent chance of <br />annual exceedence) in any 50-year period is approximately 40 percent <br />(4 in 10); and, for any 90-year period, the risk increases to <br />approximately 60 percent (6 in 10). The analyses reported herein <br />reflect flooding potentials based on conditions existing in the <br />community at the time of completion of this study. Maps and flood <br />elevations will be amended periodically to reflect future changes. <br /> <br />3.1 Hydrologic Analyses <br /> <br />Hydrologic analyses were carried out to establish peak discharge- <br />frequency relationships for each flooding source studied by <br />detailed methods affecting the community. <br /> <br />Recorded flood information for the tributary streams studied by <br />detailed methods is nonexistent. Good records do exist for the <br />South Platte River. However, due to the construction of Chatfield <br />Dam," the recorded information on the South Platte River is not <br />appl icable. As a resul t, synthet icall y deri ved hydrographs were <br />computed to determine the potential flood magnitudes for those <br />tributary streams with relatively small drainage basins. Thes.e <br />hydrographs reflect the effects of precipitation characteristics of <br />the basin, ground cover, geology, slope, drainage area, and other <br />physical characteristics of the drainage basins. To assure <br />correctness of the synthetic data, recorded flood data in adjacent <br />areas were also analyzed. <br /> <br />Flood frequency determinations were based on the standard log- <br />Pearson Type III statistical analysis of flood discharge records of <br />several streams adjacent to the study area, as well as in eastern <br />Colorado. The discharge records for the streams considered covered <br />periods of 10 to 74 years. The records and flood frequency <br />determinations were generated at various gaging stations by the <br />USGS and published as regional IOO-year data (Reference 4). In <br />addition, the analyses were correlated with the Colorado State <br />University study on flood magnitudes in the area (References 10 and <br />11). <br /> <br />In order to assure consistency in the hydrology, the recorded data <br />analyzed, as discussed above, were plotted on a graph of lOO-year <br />discharge versus drainage area. This curve was used as a <br />comparison for synthetically generated hydrograph flows for each <br />stream in the study. <br /> <br />Rainfall data for the synthetic analysis were taken from the Denver <br />Regional Council of Governments' Urban Storm Drainage Criteria <br />Manual (USDCM) (Reference 26). Synthetic hydrograph procedures <br />used in the study included the Colorado Urban Hydrograph Procedure, <br />outlined in the Denver Regional Council of Governments' USDCM <br />(Reference 26), and the COE HEC-l, computer hydrograph package <br />(Reference 27). <br /> <br />The South Platte River peak discharges for the IOO-and SOQ-year <br />frequency floods below the dam were computed to reflect the COE <br /> <br />10 <br />