Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />:::: <br /> <br />~ Environmental compliance and public awareness maintenance <br /> <br />4.3. Seeding Operations and Data Collection <br /> <br />The design phase will produce the computer software that is used to conduct the operational cloud <br />seeding. Based on established criteria, the software will determine if conditions are met for seeding and <br />proceed to instruct field equipment to initiate cloud treatment. The software will verify that equipment <br />has responded and report the status of operations. <br /> <br />Data collection during the operational phase will be determined at the completion of the design phase. It <br />is expected that in addition to data collected at the seeding sites, data will continually be obtained from <br />several instrumented towers installed at high elevations of the Headwaters Region main barriers. Data <br />from these towers will be used to assist in determining seeding conditions. It may be necessary for <br />environmental compliance and seeding criteria performance checks that some periodic tracer work and <br />snow sample collection be conducted. This will provide confidence that clouds are being seeded and that <br />results indicated in precipitation data are caused by cloud treatment. The data collection issue for the <br />operational phase must be viewed in light of results (uncertainty and variability) from cloud modeling and <br />design phase field tests. <br /> <br />4.4. Estimation of Operational Seeding Costs <br /> <br />Section 4.2 lists some of the prominent tasks of conducting operational cloud seeding. Each task will <br />require costly resources for accomplishment. Other costs include those for annual seeding materials that <br />for propane release are estimated at about $175,000 per season. Table 4.1 gives year-by-year operational <br />project costs for a 10-year seeding period. Yearly cost estimates beyond the first year include a 3 percent <br />inflation factor. Table 4.1 .lists annual costs for seeding equipment installation and removal. All other <br />costs are combined into a single table value for each operational field season. Table 4.2 gives a <br />breakdown of costs for the first operational year. Upon completion of the design phase, a revised set of <br />operational costs will be developed for each program component. <br /> <br />The first-year operational cost is estimated at $1,025,320, and the cost for the tenth year is $1,329,899. <br />Table 4.2 shows a 10-year cost of operations of$11,715,638. Assuming 55 cloud treatment devices are <br />installed in the Headwaters Region, the average annual cost of operations per seeding device is <br />$21,301.16. This figure includes costs for seeding materials, automatic data collection, annual data <br />analysis, operational cloud seeding (largely automated), equipment removal (when necessary) and <br />maintenance, weather forecasting and monitoring, cloud modeling, periodic evaluation of seeding results, <br />project management and oversight, environmental compliance, and public involvement. Data costs for <br />environmental compliance are included in technician support costs. Estimates cannot be met if <br />automation is not fully implemented. Costs do not include any observations by aircraft, or local scanning <br />radar. Partnering with other agencies and groups will be pursued and may help maintain costs at <br />manageable levels. The figures given here do not assume annual assistance from partnering. <br /> <br />4.5. Estimate of Operational Seeding Benefits <br /> <br />Estimates of additional water benefits and operational costs were developed assuming that cloud <br />treatment would be conducted primarily over the western and eastern barriers surrounding the North Park <br />of north-central Colorado. Additional water estimates depend on the areal coverage by the seeding <br />device network. The sample seeding device placement selected for developing additional water estimates <br />was developed by Holroyd (unpublished internal Reclamation memo, 2000) and is shown in <br /> <br />.21 <br />