My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10357
CWCB
>
Watershed Protection
>
DayForward
>
FLOOD10357
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/11/2010 2:07:19 PM
Creation date
5/15/2007 10:43:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Watershed Protection
Document ID
123
County
Rio Grande
Stream Name
Alamosa River
Basin
Rio Grande
Sub-Basin
Alamosa - Trinchera
Water Division
3
Title
Alamosa River Watershed Project Literature and Watershed Assesment, Final EPA Report
Date
9/30/2003
Prepared For
Valle del Sol Community Center
Prepared By
US Environmental Protection Agency
Watershed Pro - Doc Type
Project Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />· Compliance to laws <br />. Public health and safety <br />· Relationship to injured resources and services <br />· Technical feasibility <br />. Cost effectiveness <br />· Consistency with Trustees' restoration goals <br />· Opportunities for collaboration <br /> <br />The Trustees have developed a Phase II Ranking Criteria to evaluate and rank potential <br />restoration projects. The following criteria represent the Trustees' requirements and <br />priorities for restoration: <br /> <br />· Public Acceptance <br />· Likelihood of adverse impacts <br />· Likelihood of success <br />· Multiple resource benefits <br />· Time to provide benefits <br />· Duration of benefits <br />· Importance of NRDA funding to success of the project <br />· Protection and maintenance of the implemented project <br />· Project cost <br />· Project consistency with Regional Planning <br /> <br />Attachment 2 also contains a Fact Sheet about the for Natural Resource Restoration <br />process. <br /> <br />2.4 Assessment and Discussion <br /> <br />The Memorandum of Understanding between the NRD Trustees does not formally <br />recognize local groups, such as the Alamosa River Foundation Board, in the decision <br />making process. The Foundation needs to maintain a close working relationship with <br />the Trustees to ensure their voice is heard on watershed projects that affect their river. <br />The Foundation needs to negotiate with the NRD Trustees in order to have an active <br />presence and decision making input in the NRD process. It is especially important for <br />the Foundation to have the ability to provide the Trustees input to consultant selection, <br />proposal review, and evaluation, project management activities and project <br />effectiveness. <br /> <br />In order to have the NRD process benefit the Alamosa River Watershed, it is important <br />that all of the public's concerns and interests be voiced by one organization such as the <br />Foundation. The Foundation needs to establish and maintain a common watershed <br />vision that is consistent with the needs and values of the local community. Projects for <br />watershed restoration should be developed according to a stream restoration plan that is <br />endorsed by the Foundation. Proposed projects that are submitted by entities outside <br />the Foundation may not be consistent with the objectives of the watershed restoration <br />plan and may not be effective in achieving the long term desired results. <br /> <br />2-4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.