My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD10355
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
10001-11000
>
FLOOD10355
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/23/2009 12:50:35 PM
Creation date
5/15/2007 10:43:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Stream Name
Colorado River
Title
Colorado River Basin Probable Maximum Floods, Hoover and Glen Canyon Dams
Date
9/1/1990
Prepared By
US Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclaimation
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />73 <br /> <br /> <br />Release decisions were based on the current operating philosophy of <br />avoiding spills by incorporating changes in the forecasted runoff as <br />soon as possible, thus preserving future operational flexibility. <br /> <br />The operating objectives were to limit releases from Lake Mead to a <br />maximum of 40,000 ft3/s and to maintain as nearly as practicable, a <br />non-fluctuating flow regime below Parker Dam. In the case of Glen <br />Canyon Dam, an upper limit release of 31,500 ft3/s was observed <br />until published forecasts indicated a high risk of bypass of the <br />powerplant, at which time the release was increased to the <br />powerplant capacity of 33,100 ft3/s. As in actual practice, <br />bypasses were delayed when the possibility of not needing them <br />existed. <br /> <br />This analysis showed that the 100-year snowmelt flood can be <br />routed through Lake Mead without exceeding a release level of <br />40,000 ft3/s and without exceeding elevation 1,219.6 feet, the <br />bottom of the exclusive flood control pool. Flood control releases <br />of 29,500 ft3/s would be initiated on January 1 and gradually <br />increase to a maximum of 40,000 ft3/s by July 1. The maximum <br />release would continue through July 15, followed by a gradual <br />reduction in release levels coinciding with the flood's recession. <br />A maximum water surface elevation of 1,219.5 feet would occur on <br />July 19 through July 21. <br /> <br />At Lake Powell the releases from the dam were 31,500 ft3/s from <br />January 1 through April 30, 33,100 ft3/s from May 1 through June 7, <br />48,000 ft3/s from June 8 through June 14, and 60,000 ft3/s from June <br />15 through July 12. After this time, the releases gradually <br />decreased as the flood passed. The maximum water surface elevation <br />of 3,699.93 feet occurred on July 8. <br /> <br />Based on the results of the base snowmelt flood routings, beginning <br />reservoir elevations were determined for all of the major reservoirs <br />upstream from Hoover Dam for use in routing the flood caused by the <br />ULDRS event. Table 6.3 presents the starting reservoir elevations <br />for Lake Mead and Lake Powell based upon the starting date of the <br />ULDRS event. The upstream reservoirs were considered at the top of <br />conservation storage. <br /> <br />6.4 GLEN CANYON AND HOOVER PROBABLE MAXIMUM FLOODS <br /> <br />Determination of the probable maximum floods for Hoover and Glen <br />Canyon Dams involved generating seasonal flood hydrographs by <br />applying the results of the meteorological investigation. Numerous <br />combinations of ULDRS centerings and storm separations were <br />evaluated to determine the most critical seasonal hydrologic <br />conditions for the dam. The ULDRS flood hydrographs were combined <br />with the snowmelt antecedant flood to determine the most critical <br />hydrologic condition at the dams. Results of these analyses <br />produced PMFs for the critical May through August storm season. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.