Laserfiche WebLink
<br />" <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />"They bought a 1950 reservoir for $400,000. That's a really important issue." <br /> <br />In addition to his other water-related efforts, Entz was a member of the Colorado Water Conservation <br />. Board and is a member of the Colorado Water Congress. <br /> <br />Sen. Salazar Resumes Push for National Heritage Areas: On January 31, U.S. Senator Ken Salazar <br />re-introduced two bills to designate two new National Heritage Areas (NHAs) in Colorado: the South <br />Park NHA and the Sangre de Cristo NHA. Senator Salazar introduced similar proposals during the 109th <br />Congress. <br /> <br />The South Park NHA would preserve South Park by protecting 19 working ranches along 30 miles of <br />stream corridor and 17,000 acres of wetlands and agricultural lands in the headwaters of the South Platte <br />River. <br /> <br />The Sangre de Cristo NHA will include Conejos, Costilla and Alamosa counties in the San Luis Valley. <br /> <br />Under Senator Salazar's bills, the federal government will provide matching funds to rehabilitate old <br />structures, develop tours, establish exhibits or programs, and increase public awareness of the area. <br /> <br />NHA's are not federally owned, though they can include some public land, and they consist primarily of <br />private and state holdings. Both bills ensure that private property rights and water rights are in no way <br />affected by the creation of the National Heritage Area. <br /> <br />Over the past 20 years, Congress has designated 27 National Heritage Areas (NHA) to recognize and <br />protect segments of the country that have extraordinary cultural, historical, environmental and <br />recreational resources. National Heritage Areas are conceived and managed by local citizens and <br />organizations, but the National Park Service provides administrative and technical support in their <br />establishment. <br /> <br />Status of State Legislation: We have summarized a few bills in this report. I have attached a <br />spreadsheet with the current status of water related legislation we are monitoring. The status sheet also <br />indicates the Colorado Water Congress position on the legislation. <br /> <br />HBl1156: The bill requires sellers of residential property to disclose the source of water for that <br />property. That would allow rural buyers to know ifit comes from a well that could be running dry, <br />and it would allow urban dwellers to investigate the quality of the water. The bill adds a section to <br />sales contracts that states whether the water is from a well, a water provider or another source, such <br />as a cistern. <br /> <br />HB 1197: The bill allows Colorado counties to enforce federal water pollution regulations. <br />The federal EP A stormwater quality regulations include violations such as illicit discharges of dirt <br />and sediment from construction sites or chemical discharges from companies and homes, among <br />others. <br /> <br />Cities with populations over 100,000 already are responsible for policing water quality issues in <br />their storm drainage run-off systems. Counties have long relied on state agencies for enforcement in <br />their unincorporated areas. <br /> <br />HB 1013: The bill to strip governments' ability to take water rights through eminent domain. <br /> <br />lIB 1132 - The measure to allow water court judges to consider environmental impacts of large <br />water transfers could have on river basins is on its way to the governor's office. The bill allows for <br />water judges to reject applications to remove 1,000 acre-feet or more from a river if such a transfer <br />is environmentally harmful to a basin. <br /> <br />17 <br />