Laserfiche WebLink
<br />000183 <br /> <br />percent entrainment of larvae into floodplains, and monthly survival of fish in floodplains and in <br />the main river channel. I recommend that the Recovery Program maintain and refine this model <br />as a tool in helping to understand those aspects of the Habitat Restoration Program that are most <br />critical to the recovery of the razorback sucker. <br /> <br />Use of floodplains by razorback sucker depends on many factors external to species demography, <br />including timing of availability, duration of connection with the mainstem, and ability of the <br />floodplain to hold quality water for overwintering fish. It is also unknown ifthe inter-annual <br />frequency of flooding is sufficient to establish and maintain a demographically and genetically <br />viable population of razorback sucker. A recruitment model that simulates survival for the <br />historic hydrographic record of the Green River may be necessary to provide insights into inter- <br />annual flood frequency necessary to maintain a population of 5,800 adults. <br /> <br />136 Floodplain Habitat Management Plans: <br /> <br />The following recommendations identify actions that should either be implemented immediately <br />or should be prioritized for implementation. These recommendations are intended to provide <br />direct and immediate guidance for initiating implementation ofthis floodplain management plan. <br />These actions are not ordered by priority. <br /> <br />1. Suspend further acquisition of private property easements in the Green River Subbasin. <br /> <br />Activities and expenditures by the Recovery Program for further acquisition of private <br />property easements in the Green River Subbasin should be suspended, except for <br />completion of negotiations with Thunder Ranch. Floodplain area currently accessible to <br />the Recovery Program through coordination with State and Federal agencies is sufficient <br />for recovery of razorback sucker. Further acquisition of easements should be continued <br />only if potential floodplain depression area is insufficient through coordinated efforts. <br /> <br />2. Implement restoration and management of Thunder Ranch floodplain. <br /> <br />The first priority of this Plan is restoration and management of the floodplains at Thunder <br />Ranch. This floodplain is only 5 miles from the razorback sucker spawning bar and can <br />potentially entrain large numbers of wild-produced razorback sucker larvae. <br /> <br />3. Coordinate management of Stewart Lake with Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, <br />Bureau of Reclamation, and US. Fish and Wildlife Service. <br /> <br />Stewart Lake is managed by the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (UDWR) primarily <br />for waterfowl. Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) and US. Fish and Wildlife Service <br />(Service) have implemented remediation measures for selenium, which has been <br />identified as a risk to fish health. Stewart Lake currently has the structural components <br />(i.e., inlet/outlet control gates, lowered portions of levee for flooding, trenched depression <br />for draining) for management as a 12-month depression floodplain, and the Recovery <br /> <br />2003 Report Recommendations, <br />