Laserfiche WebLink
<br />000182 <br /> <br />2. A thorough evaluation of the Colorado River Wildlife Management Area should be <br />conducted to evaluate its value to fish and designation as a National Wildlife Refuge. <br />The limited acquired acreage does not afford the habitat needs necessary to self sustain a <br />viable population of endangered Colorado River fishes. Other habitats in public and <br />private ownership do not provide long term preservation. <br /> <br />3. CR WMA has no funding for equipment or additional staffing to conduct habitat <br />management activities within the easements despite an urgent need for control of noxious <br />weeds. It is hoped that future funding can be secured for this and other habitat <br />improvement projects which will restore ecosystem integrity to these valuable and <br />dwindling riparian habitats. Weare not required to control the weeds but we do reserve <br />the right to do so under the terms of the easement. <br /> <br />4. CRWMA has no dedicated vehicle or facilities. The management area is fortunate to <br />have access to a vehicle, office space, and office equipment provided by Ouray NWR. It <br />is hoped that funding will be forthcoming for equipment and facilities in the future. <br /> <br />C-6 Construction: Proceed with Thunder Ranch, Ela Sanctuary, and Hot-Spot Complex. <br /> <br />C-6 RZ/BT: This project should continue as scheduled in the approved scope of work. <br />C-6 Larval Entrainment: <br /> <br />Our experience using biodegradable gelatinous neutrally buoyant beads (beads) has shown that <br />this method is very useful and practical for evaluating entrainment of drifting particles. We <br />recommend evaluating drift and entrainment rates of beads released at known <br />(Razorback/Escalante bar) and potential spawning sites into selected floodplain wetlands. <br /> <br />Continue to evaluate the most effective breach connections for entraining drift at various points <br />on the hydro graph and to use this data to refine the Floodplain Drift Model and for testing <br />floodplain management scenarios. <br /> <br />C-6 Razorback Sucker Model: <br /> <br />Parameters (i.e., input variables) that determine floodplain area necessary to support a given <br />population size of razorback sucker are largely unknown, and use of these parameters gives the <br />model output varying degrees of uncertainty. However, a reasonable range of values for some <br />parameters is known and can be used as a starting point to gauge the value of other lesser known <br />parameters. This allows the user to "game" with the model in trying to better understand <br />unknown variables and inter-relationships. Initially, the model may have limited utility, but as <br />more is known about conservation of the razorback sucker and the population expands, there will <br />be more opportunity to ground-truth and refine the model. The area of floodplain habitat <br />necessary can be more precisely assessed as empirical data are collected from ongoing <br />investigations that provide greater accuracy for model inputs. Empirical data needed for this <br />model refinement include estimates of longitudinal survival/and retention of drifting larvae, <br /> <br />2003 Report Recommendations, <br />