Laserfiche WebLink
<br />(JOlJ'71.6 <br /> <br />Fish and Wildlife Comments <br /> <br />have no problem with language in any agreement worked out to allow reservoirs to opt <br />out of participating in peak-flow augmentation under these conditions. <br /> <br />6) When the Executive Committee has had an opportunity to review comments and develop <br />a recommendation for a action, the Committee needs to present their recommendation <br />to the Recovery Program Management Committee. The Management Committee will act <br />as the arbiter/referee to ensure that all parties are cooperating and sharing the "pain" <br />equally. <br /> <br />In conclusion, the implementation of a peak-flow augmentation strategy is an expectation ofthe <br />PBO and, as such, should be coordinated with the Recovery Program Management Committee <br />and the Service to ensure that it meets PBO objectives. The appropriate Service contact for this <br />purpose would be our Grand Junction Ecological Services Field Office. However, I will <br />continue to serve as the Service liaison to the Executive Committee and we all look forward to <br />the next phase of this process. <br /> <br />George Smith <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />P:\Data \GEN\CWCB\19665\Report Phase 2\ Technical Memorandum No. 12\Appendix B.doc <br /> <br />24 <br />