Laserfiche WebLink
<br />002211 <br /> <br />When Denver incurs a liability to repay Green Mountain Reservoir for water stored out-of-priority at Dillon <br />Reservoir, provisions of the Blue River Decree, as more specifically described in a 1964 Stipulation and Agreement, <br />allow Denver to replace the water owed by substituting releases from its Williams Fork Reservoir. In 1991, the <br />agreements were again modified to allow use of the proposed Wolford Mountain Reservoir as an additional source <br />of substitution supply for waters owed to Green Mountain Reservoir by Denver. Theses agreements also make <br />reference to a requirement for Denver to maintain a pool of 1,000 acre-feet in Dillon Reservoir, which must be <br />released to Green Mountain Reservoir, to the extent necessary to maintain the flow in the Blue River below Dillon <br />Dam at 50 cfs. <br />Definition of Green Mountain Fill. For purposes of administration of a fill for Green Mountain Reservoir, there are <br />two separate accounting procedures. The first is the Blue River Decree Fill and is computed as the sum of: (1) water <br />actually stored in Green Mountain since the initiation of storage for the year (typically between April 1 and May <br />15); (2) releases of all inflow since the initiation of storage greater than the amount required to satisfy operating <br />criteria provisions, including downstream rights senior to August 1, 1935 (60 cfs for downstream senior rights); (3) <br />depletions caused by Senate Document 80 beneficiaries, including contractors, whose rights are junior to August 1, <br />1935 and are located upstream of Green Mountain, and (4) the contents of Green Mountain Reservoir at the time of <br />initiation of storage. A Blue River Decree Fill is achieved when this sum equals 154,645 acre-feet. Note that the <br />Blue River Decree Fill excludes water bypassed for instream flows but includes any water that is released for the <br />sole purpose of hydro-electric power generation. This fill limit is specifically defmed for the benefit of Denver and <br />Colorado Springs, both of which are allowed to store out-of-priority as against the Green Mountain power right <br />because they have agreed to compensate for power interference. <br /> <br />The second type of fill is the Division 5 Fill is essentially the same except that the sum excludes the releases of <br />inflow that are made solely for purposes of hydro-electric power generation. This provision reflects that these <br />releases of inflow are essentially bypasses for the direct flow right rather than storage releases. <br />Green Mountain Reservoir has a senior re-fill storage right in the amount of 6,316 acre-feet, with an appropriation <br />date of August 1, 1935. It can only be exercised after completion of the Division 5 Fill. Releases for replacement of <br />depletions of Senate Document 80 beneficiaries and replacement of evaporation losses can be credited to the re-fill <br />account. If any re-fill water remains in storage at the start-of-fill, it is considered as part of the contents of the <br />reservoir for the next year's fill. <br />There is a conditional junior re-fill storage right for Green Mountain Reservoir (Case No. 88CW22) for 154,645 <br />acre-feet which can be exercised only after the senior re-fill right is satisfied. For purposes of accounting, the junior <br />re-fill right has the same administration date as the conditional re-fill right for Dillon, pending in Case No. <br />87CW376. When in priority, the available flow shall be divided in a manner which essentially allows Green <br />Mountain to store its share of the inflow originating below Dillon and allows Denver to store its share of inflow <br />originating above Dillon Reservoir. Denver will observe the 50 cfs bypass and Green Mountain will observe the 60 <br />cfs/85 cfs bypass requirements. These bypasses are not considered storable inflow for the junior re-fill right. <br />Water stored under the Dillon re-fill right before Green Mountain Reservoir achieves its Blue River Decree Fill, <br />belongs to Green Mountain and is deliverable thereto (directly or by substitution) in the event that the Blue River <br />Decree Fill is not realized. <br />C.8.1.3 CRDSS Considerations <br />Accounts in Granby Reservoir. For purposes of the CRDSS, Granby Reservoir was modeled with two storage <br />accounts. <br />1. CBT/Windv Gap Operational Pool- 465,568 acre-feet reserved for the combined operations of the CBT <br />Project and the Windy Gap Project. Windy Gap diversions would be placed in Granby storage only to the <br />extent that capacity is available (either for storage in the reservoir or flow capacity in the Adams Tunnel). <br />2. Inactive/Dead Storage Pool- 74,190 acre-feet. <br />Bypass Requirements at Shadow Mountain and Granby Reservoirs. For purposes of simulating the bypass <br />requirements below Granby and Shadow Mountain reservoirs, the CRDSS WRPM includes a bypass demand just <br />below these reservoirs that have administration dates just senior to the storage rights. The amount of these demands <br />is described in the previous text. <br />Demands at the Adams Tunnel. Historic deliveries through the Adams Tunnel are used for purposes of the <br />CRDSS historical scenario and for calibration. For the CRDSS baseline scenario, total demands at the Adams <br />Tunnel were obtained from the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District. This future demand represents <br />integrated operation of the CBT and Windy Gap projects, as well as integrated use of both Eastern Slope and <br />Western Slope project reservoirs. <br />