My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC142
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
20000-20849
>
WSPC142
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 4:15:57 PM
Creation date
4/22/2007 10:24:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.761.09
Description
CO River Basin Orgs - US NPS - Black Canyon Of The Gunnison National Monument - Meetings
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
6/26/2001
Author
Unknown
Title
Meetings 2001-2002 - RE-US NPS-Black Canyon of the Gunnison - Agendas-Draft Agendas-Reviewed with Notes - 06-26-01 through 03-27-02
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />* <br /> <br />""' <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />uOJ7J8 <br /> <br />Black Canyon Conference Call Notes <br />Prepared by Randy Seaholm, Chief, Water Supply Protection <br />March 27,2002 <br /> <br />Participants <br />Rod Kuharich <br />Kent Holsinger <br />Randy Seaholm <br />Marc Catlin <br />Chris Treese <br />Leslie James <br />Clayton Palmer (Listening Only) <br />Venue <br />. Kay Alexander asked the Supreme Court to act on this and it may start to move now. <br />Apparently, no cover letter was attached to the petition explaining the issue. Thanks <br />to Kay for doing this. <br /> <br />Stay <br />. Dave Gehlert, Justice, promised an answer within 4-5 weeks following filing of stay. <br />Therefore, should see an answer by mid-April. <br />. David Barnhardt is willing to get things moving as well. <br />. It was noted that W AP A and CREDA did not get language included in paragraph 9 <br />that they had requested. We asked that we be notified of their requests in the future. <br />Apparently, this was language that John McClow passed judgement on and we simply <br />were not are of it. <br /> <br />CDOW <br />. We need some input from Tom Nesler concerning the impact ofW AP A proposal on <br />trout in the Black Canyon and on endangered fish downstream of the Uncompahgre <br />in critical habitat. Kent and I have since followed-up with Tom and have an e-mail <br />on this. <br /> <br />USF & WS Flow Recommendations <br />. The previous assumptions concerning sediment transport did not accurately reflect the <br />research that was done. <br />. According to Kirk Lagorie, W AP A's consultant or Argon Laboratories, John Pitlick's <br />recommendations were appropriate but they were not incorporated correctly into the <br />first set of flow recommendations. <br />. It was suggested that state representatives meet and discuss this matter with Kirk <br />. We should call Bob Muth and see if we can have ample opportunity to review and <br />comment on any revised flow recommendations. We would like at least 30-days for <br />this review. <br /> <br />Federal Family <br />. Apparently they have a conference call every 2-3 weeks to discuss this matter. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.