Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />-, ',-~ r~ ~"" <br />";Jl..lSt <br /> <br />Mr. Porzak <br />December 22, 2003 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />The Boating Park flow requirements will apply to 'the "D" Hole andChaflie'sHole <br />control structures, both of which are located on the Yampa River just downstream of <br />the confluence with Soda Creek. Consequently, the streamflow availability calculations <br />account for the Soda Creek contributions to Yampa River flows. As shown on Figure 1, <br />the USGS gage Yampa River at Steamboat Springs (Yampa River Gage) is located just <br />upstream of Soda Creek and the control structures. The period of record for the Yampa <br />River Gage is from 1910 through 2002. Theavailabte flow at the Boating Park control <br />structures is equal to the Yampa River Gage flow plus the Soda Creekinflow. <br />- - <br /> <br />Streamflow records of Soda Creek are not available. Our initial investigation <br />indicates that the basin characteristics for Fish Creek are similar to Soda Creek. The <br /> <br />USGS gage Fish Creek at Upper Station near Steamboat Splings (Fish Creek Gage) is <br />located on Fish Creek near its confluence with the Yampa River, as shown on Figure 1. <br />The period of record for the Fish Creek Gage is 1967 through .1972 and 1983 through <br />2002. We have estimated the Soda Creek drainage area to be approximately 26.20 <br />square miles, which is fairly close to the reported Fish Creek drainage area (above the <br />gage) of 24.80 square miles. <br /> <br />For the streamflow availability analysis, we have assumed the streamflow <br />reported at the Fish Creek gage to be representative of the Soda Creek flow into, the <br />Yampa River. Based on our initial evaluation of both drainage basins, we conclude that <br />the approximation of Soda Creek inflow with the Fish Creek gage is sufficiently accurate <br />to verify streamflow availability for the Boating Park. Any minor adjustments resulting <br />from a more detailed hydrological analysis would not significantly impact the overall <br />results and conclusions of the streamflow availability analysis. <br /> <br />The period of record of 1983 through 2002 was selected as the study period for <br />the analysis. Gaged flow in the Yampa River during this period for April 15 through <br />October 31 averaged 277,000 acre~feet per year, which is similar to the long-term <br />gaged flow of 286,000 acre-feet since 1910. I conclude that 1983 through 2002 <br />