My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001 CO Water Education Final Report
CWCB
>
Water Conservation
>
Backfile
>
2001 CO Water Education Final Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2009 12:13:27 AM
Creation date
4/16/2007 1:53:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Conservation
Project Type
General OWC
Project Name
Colorado Water Education Activities for 2001
Title
2001 Colorado Water Education Accomplishments and Recommendations
Date
12/28/2001
County
Statewide
Water Conservation - Doc Type
Final Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Second group: <br />a. establish solid, ongoing funding bast <br />b. develop educational objectives <br />c. include as many groups/interests as possible (geographically inclusive) <br />d. determine educational goals, needs <br /> <br />3. What groups should be represented? Comments from three groups. <br />Group one: <br />State, districts (K-12), industry, water districts, watershed groups and <br />assembly, developers, federal agencies, academia, RMWEA, local <br />government, research institutions, wastewater, environmental groups <br /> <br />Group two: <br />Division of Wildlife, news media, agriculture industry/state agriculture <br />Department, landscaping/nursery, environmental groups (e.g. Sierra Club, <br />Nature Conservancy), CDPHE, state climatologist, water attorney, <br />Ph.D. hydrologist (USGS or university), CWC, developer/real estate, <br />state representative, financial person, educator - science coordinator, U.S. <br />Forest Service, Colo.Geological Survey, Colo. State Parks, 4-H clubs <br /> <br />Suggested that might want to hire lobbyist <br /> <br />Group three: <br />Representation statewide: <br />river basins <br />developers <br />water providers <br />watersheds <br />general population <br /> <br />educators <br />recreationists <br />scientists <br />agriculture <br /> <br />4. Who should be on the Board of Directors? Comments two groups <br />See stakeholders in question 3 <br />People with money and power <br /> <br />5. What type of geographical representation is needed? <br />Can look at from two perspectives: watershed or population as <br />represented in the state legislature (House of Representatives) <br />By watershed - includes water rights, geographically inclusive <br />By population - more representation from Front Range <br /> <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.