Laserfiche WebLink
<br />commercial and private fishing activity in the <br />watershed are not readily available but col- <br />lection and analysis of that information is a <br />recommended action. <br /> <br />7.3 RECREATION <br />OBJECTIVlES AND <br />RECOMMENDED ACTIONS <br /> <br />7.3.1 OBJECTIVE: Determine <br />Recreational Carrying Capacity <br />to Protect Resources and <br />Quality of the Recreational <br />Experience <br /> <br />Recommended Actions <br /> <br />1. COOPERATIVELY INITIATE <br />CARRYING CAPACITY STUDY <br /> <br />Determining the recreational Carrying <br />Capacity is essential before any major <br />management decisions regarding recre- <br />ation are made. A cooperative effort <br />between the BLM, USFS, CDOW, Eagle <br />County,Towns, commercial boating and <br />fishing outfitters, private users and pri- <br />vate landowners should: <br /> <br />1. Study the current situation, moni- <br />toring use levels by all recreational <br />activities. <br /> <br />2. Determine what recreational prefer- <br />ences are, and establish what <br />impacts they may be having. <br /> <br />3. Establish the Carrying Capacity and <br />Limits of Acceptable Change (LAC) <br />appropriate within the watershed <br />for public lands (federal, state, <br />town, county) and the waterway. <br />Impacts on private lands should <br />also be studied. The carrying capac- <br />ity should address the physical, <br />ecological, and social capacities of <br /> <br />56 <br /> <br />~~ <br />I~~ <br /> <br />the river and the existing recre- <br />ational facilities. It is recommended <br />that the agencies use LAC to deter- <br />mine the desirable conditions for <br />the Eagle Watershed, and not base <br />decisions on simply how much use <br />the watershed can tolerate. (See <br />References for USFS Manual for <br />Establishing Limits of Acceptable <br />Change and Glossary for further <br />definition of Carrying Capacity). <br /> <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />, <br />. <br />- <br /> <br />t <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />., <br />, <br />. <br />. <br />...... <br /> <br />. <br />, <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />" <br /> <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />, <br />. <br />if <br /> <br />. <br />, <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />4. Consider the economic impact of <br />enforcing these limits when making <br />a determination. <br /> <br />5. Create an interagency monitoring <br />group that includes local citizens <br />and recreation outfitters to accu- <br />rately gauge recreation growth and <br />recognize problems as they arise <br />(also see Chapter 3: Implementa- <br />tion). The heavily used recreation <br />section of the Arkansas River has <br />been designated a State Park and is <br />regulated through a cooperative <br />system between state and federal <br />agencies. <br /> <br />7.3.2 OBJECTIVE: Determine the <br />Condition of the Fishery <br /> <br />Recommended Action <br /> <br />I. COOPERATIVELY STUDY FISHERY <br />CONDITIONS <br /> <br />As stated above in "Carrying Capacity," a <br />detailed study of the exact condition of <br />the fishery and limits of acceptable <br />change must be done to assist manage- <br />ment in making sound decisions. This <br />study should occur prior to, or concur- <br />rently with, the above effort and exam- <br />ine the state of the fishery in terms of <br />the aquatic wildlife and the impacts of <br />increased fishing pressure, development <br />and may include creel census, user sur- <br />veys, fish counts, habitat inventories, <br />