My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ01852
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
PROJ01852
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2011 10:12:17 AM
Creation date
4/5/2007 9:55:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C150026
Contractor Name
Ute Water Conservancy District
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
72
County
Mesa
Bill Number
SB 99-173
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br /> <br />~.; <br /> <br />CDM Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. <br /> <br />Draft Staging (5/17/96) <br />Page Number 3 <br /> <br />Table I may be used to break the project depletion requirements into 5 or 10 year incremental <br />growth stages or, alternatively, Figure 1 may be used to establish increments on any desired time <br />line. <br /> <br />Using the currently accepted hydrology, 1,500 acre-feet of average annual make-up flow would <br />address depletions needs through the year 2006 or 10 years from now. 1,500 acre-feet of make- <br />up flow, using the CWCB instream flow filings as targets rather than the USFWS flow targets, <br />would address needs through the year 2022 (26 years from now). <br /> <br />Monitoring and Control <br /> <br />As has been discussed previously, the current demand projections would result in a new pipeline <br />sized at approximately 48 inches. A requirement for monitoring is straightforward to address <br />since Ute Water will be metering flow in and out of the water treatment plant and reporting this to <br />the state. The notion of a restricting method of flow control is impractical because the pipeline <br />must be sized to meet the peak daily demands rather than annual volumetric limits. <br /> <br />Conclusion <br /> <br />- <br />An initial staging limit based on 1,500 acre-feet of make-up flows is consistent with the currently <br />accepted hydrology and would allow a ten year planning horizon for the recovery program and <br />Ute Water. Such an approach would allow for approval by the USFWS without the need to <br />designate an interim RP A and should be acceptable based on comments made at the May 9 <br />meeting. It is recommended that this concept be discussed further with the other members of the <br />committee on May 23, 1996. Please call if we can provide more clarification. <br /> <br />0:\8047 -11 O\DOC\51696C.MEM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.