Laserfiche WebLink
<br />: ~-.. <br /> <br />6. In Chapter V, each of the no-project alternatives should include some quantitative <br />analysis of the implications of not constructing the proposed project, i.e.; how <br />much capacity will be lost in terms offlow rates or acre-feet per year. <br /> <br />7. The discussions on pages 63 and 64 indicate that no federal permits will be <br />required. Is this true? <br /> <br />8, The financial analysis needs to be revised and expanded to reflect the recently <br />selected alternative and the financial impacts on the GLIC. Some discussion of <br />collateral should be included. <br /> <br />Please let me know if you have any questions on any of the preceding comments or on my <br />markup. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br /></S~ <br /> <br />William E. Green, P.E. <br />Manager of Planning <br />Planning and Construction Section <br /> <br />cc: Bill Stanton <br />Dave Bernhardt, GLIC <br />