My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
C153582 Feasibility Study
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
C153582 Feasibility Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:43:30 AM
Creation date
4/2/2007 3:05:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C153582
Contractor Name
Colorado River Water Conservation District
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
0
County
Larimer
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br /> <br />'.- <br /> <br />YAMPA STUDY DEMANDS <br />August 15, 1994 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />Other <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Other included demands not reflected in the itemized sectors such as snow-making. <br /> <br />Reservoir Evaporation <br /> <br />Reservoir evaporation was detennined as remaining constant except for the specific <br />evaporation associated with the various new reservoir options considered. <br /> <br />Basin Export <br /> <br />Minor exports from the Yampa River basin currently go from Yamcolo Reservoir to <br />the Colorado River drainage. For the purposes of the Yampa study no new basin exports <br />were considered as all the historic basin export proposals have died. <br /> <br />Past proposals to use hydraulic pipelines to transport coal would function as basin <br />exports. These were not considered. The W.R. Grace proposal of putting coal in plastic <br />bags and propellling them to customers east of the divide projected water consumption of <br />12,000 AP. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />HYDROLOGIC MODELING <br /> <br />Water supplies and demands were representated in the hydrologic and water right <br />computer model of the Yampa River basin generated by Hydrosphere. Larger water <br />demands were represented individually and smaller water demands were often "aggregated" <br />in the model. The model' utilized historic gage hydrology as a baseline. Existing and <br />historic water demands were considered to be "embeded" in the gage record. The gage <br />records were adjusted for the existing demands which occurred for only part of the 1930 <br />to 1982 study period. <br /> <br />Demand Location <br /> <br />In the hydrologic model demands were located in "nodes" as close as possible to <br />where they do or are likely to occur. The 8,000 AP coal gasification plant was located near <br />Craig, upstream of the Williams Fork, in the "worst" place hydrologically, possible. <br /> <br />Demand Priority <br /> <br />Demands were assigned priorities in the hydrologic model based on the current <br />access of such demands to water right priorities and storage water. Water demands with <br />undefined priorities were treated as junior users in aggregate. <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.