My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
LPPD000400
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
LPPD000400
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:01:21 AM
Creation date
3/26/2007 10:37:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C150067
Contractor Name
Lower South Platte Water Conservancy District
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
64
County
Logan
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />determining the right of owners to sign petitions as <br /> <br /> <br />irrigated or non-irrigated landowners, the assessors' records <br /> <br /> <br />shall be prima-facie evidence that land assessed as "irrigated <br /> <br /> <br />land" is, in fact, irrigated land and that land classified <br /> <br /> <br />and assessed under a category other than "irrigated land" <br /> <br /> <br />is "non-irrigated land." This prima-facie evidence may be <br />rebutted, and this Court concluded as a matter of law that <br />the application of water to land in the regular practice of <br />irrigation for the purpose of growing plant life thereon as <br />an integral part of the operation of a commercial agricultural <br />or commercial horticultural enterprise shall be evidence the <br />land is "irrigated land" without regard to the assessors' <br />classification. This Court, in the order of March 17, 1964, <br />further concluded as a matter of law that the application of <br /> <br />water to real property for the purpose of growing a lawn, <br /> <br />shrubs, trees or family garden for the use and enjoyment of <br /> <br /> <br />the owners or occupants shall not of itself be sufficient <br /> <br /> <br />to overcome the presumption of a proper classification by <br /> <br /> <br />the assessor that the land is other than "irrigate'd land.'. <br /> <br /> <br />13. This Court determined as a matter of law that <br /> <br /> <br />owners of land in co-tenancy are individually "owners." <br /> <br /> <br />14. This Court determines as a matter of law that a <br /> <br /> <br />vendor of land being sold under contract shall be considered <br /> <br /> <br />as an owner and a vendee of such land shall not be considered <br /> <br />as an owner. <br /> <br />15. This Court determines as a matter of law that a <br /> <br /> <br />partnership which owns land is one owner. <br /> <br /> <br />16. This Court determines as a matter of law that if <br /> <br /> <br />the agent or other person signing in a representative <br /> <br /> <br />capacity alleged his authority or position, the burden was <br /> <br />-6- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.