Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br />'" <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />('. <br /> <br />l. ,a <br />'~.~.-., <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Table 2...RawJlV!lter Fund Indicators <br />,", -_ u ',' ~"~<"""" <br /> <br /> Operating Long-Term Debt per Debt Service <br />Year Ratio Debt Capita Ratio <br />1995 1.65 $24,624,578 $556 1.04 <br />1994 1.78 $25,904,160 $585 1.03 <br />1993 1.71 $26,693,327 $603 0.93 <br /> <br />-' <br />PROPOSED PROJECT <br /> <br />Green Ridge Glade Reservoir is an off-channel reservoir located about seven miles west of <br />Loveland and north of the Big Thompson River near the east-slope facilities of the C-BT Project <br />(please see the attached map and schematic). Both the City's C-BT water as well as Big <br />Thompson River water are diverted through the C-BT Project facilities to the reservoir. <br /> <br />The recommendations of the 1988 Phase II alternatives analysis included: purchase of additional <br />C-BT units. additional water conservation measures. and'the expansion of Green Ridge Glade <br />Reservoir to a capacity of3.500 acre-feel The major factors inf}uencing:the City's selection of a <br />6.000 acre-foot reservoir capacity are: (1) the amounts of emergency storage and operating <br />storage required for the long run. (2) the ultimate capaCity of the site, and (3) the cost of <br />enlarging the reservoir to its ultimate capacity at a .future date. <br /> <br />For the long run. the City estimates it will require about 2.000 aCre-feet for emergency storage in <br />addition to the 3.500 acre-feet recommended in the Phase II report for operational and flood pool <br />storage. Also irsnorlld be noted that 6.000 acre-feet is the ultimate capacity of the Green Ridge <br />Glade site and that a future dam raise would likely be more expensive on a per acre.foot basis <br />than enlarging now to 6.000 acre-feet. <br /> <br />In March of 1996. the City completed a preliminary engineering evaluation of the Green Ridge <br />Glade R~ervoir site in a report prepared by GEl Consultants of Englewood. The study included <br />several alternatives for raising the dam and enlarging the reservoir to capacities of3.000 and <br />6,000 acre-feet. Table 3 summarizes several of the alternatives in the report. <br /> <br />Table 3. Summary of Alternatives <br /> <br /> Probable . Probable Cost per <br />Enlaraement Alternative Caoital Cost Acre-FootofCaoacitv <br />6.000 Ac-Ft $17.3 million $2,875 <br />3.000 Ac-Ft wI Later Enlomt. $13.7 million $4,575 <br />3,000 Ac-Ft $11.8 milliorn $3,950 <br /> <br />3 <br />