My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ01756
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ01756
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2009 11:43:28 AM
Creation date
3/8/2007 10:47:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
FS0042X
Contractor Name
Elizabeth, Town of
Contract Type
Miscellaneous
Water District
0
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.. .\ ..J.J e..' <br /> <br />1994 Master Plan Update <br />Town of Elizabeth <br /> <br />As shown, additional supply must be added to the water system to meet the <br />current demands and the projected demands on the system. The storage <br />capacity is slightly lower than criteTia for the pTojected demands, but is <br />acceptable thTOUgh the study peTiod if the supply is gTeater than peak day <br />demand. Table 5 shows that 70 gpm must be added to meet the current <br />demands and 175 gpm must be added to meet the minimum supply <br />requirements for the projected demands through the study period. <br /> <br />Water System Recommendations <br /> <br />We recommend that, at a minimum, the total additional supply of 175 gpm be <br />added to the system immediately by constructing and equipping a new well to <br />the Arapahoe aquifer. The well should be sized to allow the pumping rate to be <br />increased to the maximum aquifer yield in the future. The Town should consider <br />equipping the well to the full capacity of the aquifer (approximately 300 gpm). <br />This will allow the other wells to be rested and used only on a stand-by or <br />backup basis. The additional cost to equip the well to full capacity is expected <br />to be small relative to the total well facility cost. This alternative can be <br />evaluated once the well is drilled and the capacity is determined. <br /> <br />We have not reviewed the total annual yield of water to determine if it is <br />currently available from the existing wells. We have also assumed that the <br />additional flow rate and annual yield necessary to meet the demands projected <br />through the study period will be available from one well in one aquifer. These <br />assumptions must be confiTmed by Mr. Robert Tafelski, HRS Water Consultants, <br />the Town's groundwater consultant. <br /> <br />WateT System Costs <br /> <br />Estimated costs for the recommended improvements to the supply and storage <br />facilities are summarized in Table 6 below. <br /> <br />Meurer & Associates <br />October 5, 1994 <br />Page 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.