Laserfiche WebLink
<br />:1/ <br /> <br />/ <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />I' <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />- 3- <br /> <br />.2. <br /> <br />Persons or agencies within each State that should be contacted concerning potential <br />augmentation options. <br /> <br />Colorado believes that comments from water users, at least in Colorado, should be <br />supplied to and coordinated with the Colorado Water Conservation Board so that the <br />consulting team knows the State of Colorado's position with respect to long-term <br />augmentation options and the operation of such. Towards this end, Colorado has sent a <br />letter to its water users requesting input on this matter. <br /> <br />Prior studies, reports, or other information about potential augmentation options that <br />should be considered during the study. <br />. Colorado has recently completed the first phase of a "Statewide Water Supply <br />Investigation" which identifies Colorado's projected water needs and possible <br />options for meeting those needs. Efficiently meeting those needs could help <br />alleviate some of pressure on Colorado River water supplies. <br />. Colorado's weather modification requirements and list of permit holders, while <br />outside ofthe scope of this effort, may help to see how the two efforts could <br />compliment one another. <br /> <br />Flood Protection. Water Project PlanninlSand Finance. Stream and Lake Protection <br />Water Supply Protection. Conservation Planning <br /> <br />a:! ~ ~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />