Laserfiche WebLink
<br />· The Court shall retain jurisdiction in this matter for a period of five (5) years commencing from <br />the date that the Applicant reports to the Division Engineer that 75% of the allowable additional . <br />demand to augmented hereunder has been served by the structures augmented by this decree. <br />. Applicant shall install, maintain and monitor at locations determined by the Division Engineer, <br />and at Applicant's expense, such measuring devices, provide as-built pond capacity tables, and <br />accounting, and supply such calculations regarding the timing of depletions as may be required <br />by the Division Engineer. <br /> <br />(5) Case No. 5-01CW354: Application of Grand Elk Partners, LLC <br /> <br />The Board ratified this statement of opposition at its March 2002 meeting. The Board's main objective in <br />filing the statement of opposition in this case was to ensure that the Applicants' proposed change of water <br />rights and additional source of augmentation water under a previously decreed plan for augmentation <br />would not injure the Board's instream flow water rights on Tenmile Creek, the Fraser River and the <br />Colorado River. <br /> <br />The Board holds the following instream flow ("ISF") water rights that could have been injured by this <br />application: <br /> <br />CWCB Case StreamlLake Amount Approp. Date Watershed County <br />No. (cfs) <br />5-90CW294 Tenmile Creek 4/2 11/27/90 Fraser River Grand <br />5-90CW308B Fraser River 30/19 11/27/90 Fraser River Grand <br />5-80W447 Colorado River 90 07/08/80 Colorado River Grand <br /> <br />The CWCB and the Applicant have agreed to the entry of a decree that will prevent injury to the Board's . <br />ISF water rights on Tenmile Creek, the Fraser River and the Colorado River. The Applicant has agreed to <br />the following terms and conditions: <br /> <br />. Applicant has agreed to continue to operate the plan for augmentation decreed in Case No. <br />98CW311, as modified in Case No. 01CW354, in accordance with all terms and conditions set <br />forth in the existing decree in Case No. 98CW311. <br />· In connection with the diversion of water under the priority of the junior surface diversions <br />(Grand Elk Golf Diversion Nos. 1 and 2) and the junior storage rights (Grand Elk Ponds A-F) <br />decreed in Case No. 98CW31I , as modified herein (all diverted at the Grand Elk Golf Diversion <br />Nos. 1, lA, 2, 2A and Grand Elk Well No. I), at any time the streamflow ofTen-Mile Creek or <br />the Fraser River, downstream from the diversion points, is less than the amounts decreed to the <br />CWCB in Case Nos. 90CW294 and 90CW308, Applicant agrees to curtail its diversions to the <br />extent necessary to restore the streamflow to the amounts decreed to the CWCB in Case Nos. <br />90CW294 and 90CW308. <br />. In connection with the junior appropriative rights of exchange, Applicant agrees: <br />o Applicant will not operate the 1998 appropriative right of exchange from the confluence <br />of the Blue River and the Colorado River to the Val Moritz Well Nos. I through 4, <br />unless the CWCB's instream flow rights decreed in Case Nos. 80CW448, 80CW446, <br />80CW447, and 90CW308 are satisfied. <br />o Applicant will not operate the 1998 appropriative right of exchange from the confluence <br />of the Blue River and the Colorado River to the Grand Elk Golf Diversion Nos. I and 2 <br />unless the CWCB's in stream flow rights decreed in Case Nos. 80CW448, 80CW446, <br />80CW447, 90CW308, and 90CW294 are satisfied. <br />. With regard to the Applicant's proposed augmentation plan, the Applicant seeks to augment: 1) . <br />diversions at the Val Moritz Well Nos. 1-4; 2) surface diversion at the Grand Elk Golf Diversion <br /> <br />36 <br />