Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />II <br />;1 <br />:1 <br />!I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />il <br />il <br /> <br />2. Technical Approach <br /> <br />2.1 Basic Research Study <br /> <br />The research proposed below is in support ofthe Colorado Water Conservation Board, <br />Flood Protection & Weather Modification Permitting Section's objective to further the <br />science of weather modification in Colorado by linking scientific analysis with an <br />operational winter-season program. For the 2003-2004 season, they desire to use the <br />CSU RAMS for precipitation forecasting and cloud seeding evaluation. The research <br />study is piggy-backed onto the Denver Water Department's operational cloud seeding <br />program in which Western Weather Consultants (Larry Hjermstad) provide the cloud <br />seeding operations. <br /> <br />The goal of the proposed research is to provide a physical evaluation of operational cloud <br />seeding in Colorado by using a well-established numerical model system. The model <br />will explicitly simulate the chain of events following seeding and if it shows a consistent <br />positive yield of precipitation, it will increase the credibility of the operational cloud <br />seeding program. Up to this point, no one has run a model with the advanced physics of <br />RAMS on a daily basis for an entire winter season to evaluate the consequences of <br />seeding. The model should determine if seeding material is likely to enter clouds, <br />nucleate ice crystals and augment precipitation processes in a beneficial way such that <br />monthly and seasonal precipitation is enhanced. This should be compared to a long-term <br />statistical evaluation of an operational seeding program, which, not being randomized, is <br />not likely to lead to convincing conclusions by the scientific community. A major <br />concern in such model-based studies is can the model replicate observed precipitation <br />amounts and spatial distributions, with sufficient skill to distinguish between seeding- <br />induced precipitation and naturally produced precipitation. To alleviate this concern we <br />propose to evaluate the performance of model precipitation forecast skill at several sites <br />for a selected one-month period. <br /> <br />It is thus proposed to run RAMS each day in real time for the 2003-2004 winter season. <br />A refined grid having 3 km grid spacing within a 240 kIn x 240 kIn box will be placed <br />over the region covering the seeding generators and the DWD project basins. The area <br />shown in Figure 3 includes not only the DWD program collection basins, but also the <br />region upwind of it where seeding is also done in the Vail Ski Area. Larry Hjermstad has <br />agreed to provide us outputs of his generators there as well so that we can examine its <br />potential impacts on the DWD program. Background IFN concentrations will be <br />determined from the Meyers et a1. (1992) formula described in the Background section, <br />unless specific measurements ofIFN are made available to us. Likewise CCN and <br />GCCN concentrations will be based on our best guess of what one should expect in the <br />region of interest, unless specific measurements are made available to us. Each daily <br />forecast simulation will run through 48 h, covering the next operational day and into Day <br />2. Output products will include precipitation rate at 2 h intervals and accumulated <br />precipitation for 6, 12 and 24 h increments through the 48 h forecast. Accumulated <br />precipitation for a given 24 h period (e.g., 6-30 h period) from each daily forecast <br />simulation will be used for the simulated monthly and seasonal totals. These 24-hour <br />model forecast precipitation amounts will be provided to WWC/Larry Hjermstad, via the <br /> <br />II-II <br />