My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PROJ00204 App Letter
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
PROJ00204 App Letter
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2011 10:12:17 AM
Creation date
1/17/2007 11:05:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C150026
Contractor Name
Ute Water Conservancy District
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
72
County
Mesa
Bill Number
SB 99-173
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Approval Letter
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The initial feasibility study for the project was completed in October of 1987 at which time the <br />cost of the project was estimated at about $16,7 million. The preliminary project design and . <br />$16.7 million cost estimate were presented to the Board in December of 1987. The Board <br />recommended a loan of $8.0 million from the Construction Fund as subsequently authorized by <br />the General Assembly in 1988 in SB-30. <br /> <br />Since 1988, a total of about $1.6 million has been disbursed from the $8.0 million authorization, <br />as shown in Table 2, leaving a remaining balance of about $6.4 million for design and <br />construction. <br /> <br />Table 2 - Summary of Disbursements from 1988 Loan Authorization <br /> <br />Original Authorization $8,000,000 <br />Original Feasibilitv Studv -$62,500 <br />Colorado River Pumping Plant -$400,000 <br />Disbursements to Date for Permitting Studies -$1,110,349 <br />Remaining Balance $6,427,151 <br /> <br />A great deal of additional planning work has been done for the project since 1988 (please see the <br />attached project summary) including an environmental impact statement (EIS) which was <br />completed in February 1998 for the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). <br /> <br />The project purpose, as stated in the EIS, is to allow the District to replace the existing pipeline <br />with a facility having sufficient capacity to meet the projected year 2045 peak daily water . <br />demand. After an extensive stakeholder involvement and public comment process, 16 <br />preliminary alternatives for meeting the project purpose were formulated and evaluated in the <br />EIS. The 16 alternatives were screened to three final alternatives and a no-action alternative that <br />were evaluated at the feasibility-level of detail. A summary of the four alternatives is displayed <br />in Table 3: <br /> <br />Table 3 - Summary of Alternatives from Ute WCD EIS <br /> <br /> <br />Nominal Pipeline <br />Diameter (Inches) <br />I'ipeline:tength' . <br />(Miles)" . <br />Capital Cost <br />LifeCycle Cost (1) <br />Water Supply (Acre- <br />Feet in year 2045) <br />Cost per Acre-Foot <br />Peak Da Flow (MGD) <br /> <br />_.lrlt;rtJ!_I.~rt.m_n <br />48 and 54 48 and 54 <br /> <br /> <br />~;;;~&o~i1'Cli(lfi:~~){~ <br />24 <br /> <br />015.4':::.: "'>:15:6:.:1" <br /> <br />15.4. <br /> <br />13.9. <br /> <br />'.,' \ <br /> <br />$30,311 ,000 <br />$34,300,000 <br />24,727 <br /> <br />$43,161,000 <br />$47,100,000 <br />24,727 <br /> <br />$26,656,000 <br />$36,200,000 <br />24,727 <br /> <br />$17,135,000 <br />$29,900,000 <br />12,807 <br /> <br />$1,387 <br />40.3 <br /> <br />$1,904 <br />40.3 <br /> <br />$1,464 <br />40.3 <br /> <br />$2,335 <br />18.0 <br /> <br />(I) Present worth of all capital, operating, maintenance and replacement costs for expected life <br />ci~~ . <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.