Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.' <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />November 10, 1987 <br /> <br />The committee corrected the consensus sheet to erase the phrase at the end of <br />the page and several other typographical errors. <br /> <br />The group reached a consensus to accept the Contractual Services for the Clean <br />Lakes Monitoring Program as presented in the agenda with a correction that the <br />current Jefferson County Mountain Water Quality Association chairman be the <br />contact person for the contract rather than Gerry Schulte specifically. A MOTION <br />to enter into the Contract for Services for the Clean Lakes Monitoring Program <br />with DRCOG was made by Newt Free and SECONDED by John Mead. The motion <br />passed unanimously. <br /> <br />There was further discussions on the service area population projections for the <br />basin. Genesee and Mt. Carbon still need to meet with DRCOG to resolve these <br />issues. The final population projections will be presented at the next task force <br />meeting. <br /> <br />The Jefferson County Mountain Water Quality Association sent a letter to the Water <br />Quality Control Commission opposing a change in recreational classification use <br />of Bear Creek Reservoir until the Clean Lakes program was completed by DRCOG. <br /> <br />January 14, 1988 <br /> <br />An additional sentence should be added to the November 10, 1987 consensus, <br />which showed the Jefferson County Mountain Water Quality Association was op- <br />posed to the proposed Water Quality Control Division classification change in Bear <br />Creek Reservoir. <br /> <br />There were further discussions on the service area population projections for the <br />basin and some minor revisions would be necessary for the Mount Carbon num- <br />bers. The employment figures for EI Rancho would need to be checked since they <br />appeared high, <br /> <br />- <br />A draft public survey questionnaire was reviewed and critiqued. The task force <br />reached a consensus that two questionnaires would need to be administered: a <br />reservoir user questionnaire; and a community watershed user questionnaire. <br />It was further agreed that a personnel interview format would also be needed for <br />a limited number of surveys at Bear Creek Park and at the Denver Parks located <br />in the watershed. The task force requested that a meeting with the City of <br />Lakewood should be made before the next meeting to get their input and support. <br /> <br />The CAPDET model for wastewater treatment facilities was presented for infor- <br />mational purposed. Costing of wastewater facilities is listed in the Phase 2 Task <br />2,2 - Cost of Wastewater Treatment. This task will provide cost estimates to help <br />select a preferred alternative. CAPDET will be able to provide some of this cost <br />information. <br />