Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />CONSENSUS SHEET <br /> <br />Bear Creek Basin Task Force <br /> <br />September 10,1987 <br /> <br />Consensus was reached to use existing land use, population and employment <br />projections for the bear creek basin. It was decided that the apparent discrep- <br />ancies which DRCOC showed for the basin were not a problem. There is a <br />predominance of large lots in the basins which partially caused the apparent <br />discrepancies. It was agreed that basin urbanization would likely occur as de- <br />picted on the map which was enclosed in the September agenda. <br /> <br />The task force also agreed that the basin study will need to identify appropriate <br />ways to provide wastewater service to the dispersed urbanization centers. It <br />was agreed that DRCOG would generate 2010 population and employment <br /> <br />October 8, 1987 <br /> <br />The task force decided that the final study should include recommendations about <br />the following areas: Aspen Park, Marshdale, Indian Hills, ldledale, and areas <br />in the South Turkey Creek subbasin. The final recommendations of the study <br />should include a recommendation that if the land use in these areas becomes more <br />intense than current uses, these areas should have centralized sewer systems. <br />The study should also include a recommendation that areas that develop contig- <br />uous to existing sewered areas should connect to the existing sewer lines, <br />wherever economically feasible. Amy Con klin will review the existing Jefferson <br />County Health Department's regulations on septic systems to determine if the <br />study should include a recommendation to support the regulations in the study <br />area. <br /> <br />The task force reviewed the population projection table in the agenda. The table <br />will be revised and included in next month's agenda. <br /> <br />Russell Clayshulte described the scope of the management study. He stated that <br />the existing task force could act for both the management study and the clean <br />lakes study. <br /> <br />Russell described the scope of work for the clean lakes study. Concern was <br />raised that more commitment for in-kind services was needed to assure that those <br />services could be provided. An identification of the in-kind monetary commit- <br />ments is also needed. Russell will work with the task force to get these com- <br />mitments by the next meeting. <br /> <br />Dennis Anderson, Colorado Department of Health, asked if the task force had <br />any objections to Bear Creek Reservoir being classified for recreation, class 1. <br />There were no objections stated. Projections for service areas based on the basin <br />forecasts. <br />