WSP12291 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. . Those who oppose any study or proposal to construct dams on the Cache la poudre usually noted that they would prefer its inclusion in the national wild and scenic rivers system. They argued that the present S.B. 439 study is a waste of taxpayers' money. In that context, several peli'sons urged that the study be terminated at this time rather than: carried forward into the second phase as planned. ' Many people argued that the study is too narrow in scope. They noted that each of the three primary purposes which a water development project in the canyon wQuld serve could possibly be accompl ished by other means. For example, municipal water requirements could potentially be satisfied with a single purpose, single reservoir project oe lesser capacity than the preliminary alternative projects under consideration. Also, it was noted that projected water requirements themselves could be reduced from what they otherwise might be if steps were taken to increase the efficiency of use in the municipal sector (e.g., through metering, pricing structures, mechanical flow-restricting devices, etc.). people cited various alternatives as potential means to achieve the improved management of already developed waters. For example, the enlargement of Horseto~th Reservoir, dredging of existing, off-channel plains reservQirs to restore their capacity, and repair and rehabilitation of those existing reservoirs and their associated delivery systems were, in the opinion of many, potentiallY viable ways of achieving the desired improvements in management without damming the Cache la Poudre. Finally, it was noted many times that there are alternatives to the use of water proj ects for th~ generation o.f peaking power. In general, these alternatives consist of either different technologies (e.g., coal ~ycling plants and co-generation) or load management practices which are designed to reduce peak loads and even out the demand for electricity. In a similar vein, many people also expressed doubt about the future demand for peaking power in light of expected in.creases in the real cost of electricty. The possibility of shifting the CBT system to a peaking operation was also raised. These issues are particularly germane since a multip~e reservoir project in the canyon is needed only if one is endeavoring to maximize development of the basin's hydropower potential and revenues from the sale of power. The other two ptoject purposes can be accomplished with a single reservoi~ project. With respect to the evaluation of the effects, or impacts, of the eight preliminary alternative projects, many people commented on the fact that the environmental, recreational, and social impacts of the potential pro~ects are not being taken into account. This relates back to the outright statements of opposition to the study and to any proposals for dams, it clearly -2-