Laserfiche WebLink
<br />:,," <br />,,',{ <br />"'1 <br />!;,;:s <br /> <br />.il <br /> <br />J <br />(l <br /> <br />!~~i' <br /> <br />{f~ <br />.>.~; <br /> <br />~i;i <br /> <br />ttl <br />";:~~ <br /> <br />.ii~l <br />~:';'.:i <br /> <br />.~;) <br />_'Ji' <br />'~;,\~ <br /> <br />(J <br /> <br />.~;. -~\ <br />0". <br />'1;":.;,;: <br /> <br />.i~J <br /> <br />{:~::;~ <br />.~'='; <br /> <br />~~:~'l <br /> <br />~.-,;;... <br />'," <br /> <br />.;;) <br />,.:(" <br /> <br />II. Process for Prioritization of Pro;ects for Nonooint Source Fundina <br /> <br />The object of Section 319 management programs is to prioritize watersheds for <br />installation of management practices which will improve water quality and the <br />beneficial uses of these waters. Prioritization of project areas, for funding <br />of demonstration projects and research activities is then central to progress <br />~ under this section of the Act. This portion of the organization chapter will <br />~ delineate a process for prioritizing projects for funding, discuss research <br />~ and statewide educational needs and their relationship to 319 and 201 funding, <br />~ and also provide guidance for the preparation of project implementation plans <br />which will demonstrate the need for nonpoint source funding. <br /> <br />Prioritization of demonstration projects involves ranking projects through the <br />use of a priority system (Table 1). The Nonpoint Source Task Force assists <br />the Qivision in applying ranking criteria and other factors to determine the <br />priority of nonpoint source projects. Once demonstration projects have been <br />ranked using this system, the Water Quality Control Division may prepare a <br />priority list for funding specific projects. This process allows both <br />tangible and intangible benefits to be weighed in the ranking. process. <br />Statewide educational projects will be funded based upon their merit,as <br />judged by the Water Quality Control Division. These projects will not be <br />ranked using priority ranking criteria. <br /> <br />The Water Quality Control Commission reviews final state priorities for <br />funding of demonstration projects and statewide programs based on the <br />recommendations of the Division, the Task Force, and the merit of individual <br />projects. Ranking of projects and recommendations for funding will occur on a <br />yearly basis, so as to coincide with federal nonpoint source funding and to <br />provide an ongoing process for evaluating statewide nonpoint source needs. <br />/' <br /> <br />j,. <br /> <br />DEMONSTRATION PROJECT RANKING SYSTEM <br /> <br />Table 1 <br /> <br />Prioritv Svstem Format <br /> <br />Part I <br /> <br />Threshold Reauirements - All demonstration projects must provide information <br />to prove that each of the four following requirements has been satisfactorily <br />addressed before the project may be considered for ranking under Part II of <br />this system. All projects must be recognized in the Colorado Nonooint <br />Assessment Reoort and recommended for action in this management program. <br /> <br />A. Matchina Funds Availabilitv - Matching fund availability must be <br />documented by the project applicant. This documentation must include <br />the source(sy of funds and a commitment to spending on the proposed <br />project. <br /> <br />B. <br /> <br />Pro;ect Imolementation Plan - This plan will provide the documentation <br />of the water qualitylnonpoint source problem, lead agency for <br />implementation of the project, and alternatives 'for improvements, and <br />the anticipated results of the project. More details on project <br />implementation plan requirements is provided in Table 2. <br /> <br />Page 15 <br />