Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Bv 2003 Age-O small mouth bass was the most common fish <120 mm collected bv shocking <br />- - - <br />and seining in both ri ffle and shoreline habitats. <br /> <br />The upstream extent of smallmouth bass has yet to be determined. 2003 sampling <br />found Age-O small mouth bass comprised 97% of the catch for fish less than 15 cm near <br />Hayden, Colorado. The Double Bridges site (RM 148) was upstream of the Elkhead River <br />confluence, and mean length of Age-O smallmouth bass was 66 cm on September 9[h. Also <br />at Double Bridge about 12% of Age-O bass were larger than 75 cm, indicating that even at <br />this upstream location members of the 2003 year-class were likely to recruit. Smallmouth <br />bass was also the most common species collected at Juniper and Maybell for fish less than 15 <br />cm. Mean length for Age-O fish was about 71 cm (September 9[h), Mean length of Age-O <br />smallmouth bass at Lily Park was 75 cm on September 10,2003. <br /> <br />Another change in the Yampa River aquatic community during the drought period <br />was the apparent increase in the crayfish population. Crayfish numbers were not quantified, <br />but were much more noticeable in 2003 than baseline years, The increase in crayfish could <br />also have been a response to altered habitats associated with low base flows. Since crayfish <br />were utilized as forage by adult smallmouth bass, a higher abundance of crayfish may have <br />been selectively advantageous for the small mouth bass population. <br /> <br />In 2003. the Duffy and Sevens sites were shifting to a small mouth bass, white sucker <br />and crayfish community indicating tropic relationships had simplified during the study <br />period. Habitat diversity was correlated with the diversity of a fish community (Scholsser <br />1982), The Shannon diversity index confirmed that habitat complexity in the Yampa River <br />had also simplified due to reduced flows in the dry cycle (Anderson and Stweart 2003), <br /> <br />The 2002 flows were advantageous for recruitment of nonnative species, There was a <br />large increase in Age-O and Age- I white sucker and carp in 2003 without improvements in <br />numbers of Age-O or Age-I native fish at Sevens. Since white sucker had higher recruitment <br />during 2002 their relative abundance was expected to increase at a faster pace than native <br />sucker. A higher proportion of white sucker could further impact native sucker species <br />through increased hybridization at Sevens, and perhaps at Lily Park. <br /> <br />Channel catfish have been identified for negative impacts to native fish populations in <br />the Colorado basin (Tyus and Nikirk 1990). The coexisting populations offlannelmouth <br />sucker, bluehead sucker and channel catfish at Lily Park in 2000 indicated native sucker have <br />not been severely impacted by channel catfish. The lack of round tail chub at Lily Park is <br />consistent with negative impacts attributable to channel catfish. <br /> <br />The U. S, Fish and Wildlife Service conducted channel catfish removal in Dinosaur <br />Canyon from 1998 to 2001, which is from 10 to 50 miles downstream of Lily Park. Mark <br />Fuller of the U.S, Fish and Wildlife Service (personal communication) estimated the channel <br />catfish population to be nearly 320 catfishlkm in Dinosaur Canyon, which is about a fourth of <br />the estimate for Lily Park. The total number of channel catfish removed from a 50-mile <br />reach in Dinosaur Canyon in 1998 and 1999 was 4,272 fish (Modde and Fuller 2002), <br /> <br />36 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />