Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />may have resulted in the electro-fishing raft traveling a greater distance in the same amount <br />of time, Also, there was a constant supply of stunned fish on the Gunnison River. There <br />were very few fishless habitats like large unproductive backwaters (Colorado River), long <br />very-shallow runs (Yampa River), or deep pools that added electro-fishing time without fish. <br />Nonetheless, the most likely explanation for the much higher fish catch per unit effort in the <br />Gunnison River was better habitat quality. Anderson and Stewart (2003) identified <br />increasing habitat diversity and invertebrate productivity with increasing base flows up to a <br />threshold, The Gunnison River appeared to be an example where habitat and productivity <br />was vel;' good for native fish. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br /> <br />YAMPA RIVER <br /> <br />Each of the Yampa River sites had distinctive characteristics for fish composition, In <br />the baseline years (1998 and 1999) flannelmouth sucker composition was about 5% at Duffy, <br />50% at Sevens and 70% at Lily Park. Bluehead sucker composition was about 4% at Duffy. <br />20% at Sevens and 8% at Lily Park, After three years oflow base flows there were sharp <br />decreases in native fishes and strong increases in nonnative fish species at all sites, <br /> <br />Fish biomass estimates were also greatly different between sites on the Yampa River, <br />Duffy had relatively low biomass and Lily Park had relatively high biomass. Total biomass <br />was reduced in the dry years compared to the baseline years at all sites, Native fish biomass <br />was lowest at each site in 2003, <br /> <br />Smallmouth bass were likely first introduced in the Yampa River basin in the late <br />1970s and were uncommon during Yampa River fish surveys prior to 1992, the year Elkhead <br />Reservoir was drained (P, Martinez, Colorado Division of Willdlife personal <br />communication). By 1998 and 1999 Age-O smallmouth bass were commonly collected from <br />shoreline habitat at Duffy. The smallmouth bass population rapidly increased during the <br />low-tlow period 2000-2002, Shallow pool habitat with warmer water temperatures increase <br />with reduced flows (Bain et al 1988). If these conditions promoted earlier spawning or a <br />longer growing season then small mouth bass recruitment could have been improved in <br />drought years, because Age-O small mouth bass larger than 75 cm could have had higher <br />over-winter survival rates than smaller YOY (P. Martinez, Colorado Division of Wi lid life <br />personal communication). Cooler water temperatures during the summer, a possible side <br />effect of releases from an enlarged Elkhead Reservoir, might interfere with over winter <br />survival Age-O smallmouth bass, <br /> <br />The impact of small mouth bass on the fish community of the Yampa River can not be <br />underestimated, Speckled dace (Rhinichrhys oscu/us) and mottled sculpin (COllUS hairdi), <br />two native species, were effectively eliminated from the Yarnpa River by 2001 (Anderson <br />2002). Speckled dace occupied swiftly flowing riffle habitats and both the fish and their <br />habitat were common in the baseline years. During the low flow years velocities in riffles <br />became slower and riffles provided productive nursery habitats for Age-O small mouth bass, <br /> <br />35 <br />