Laserfiche WebLink
<br />000882'- <br /> <br />'\ <br /> <br />S. III \ <br /> <br />.,. <br /> <br />12/9/63 <br /> <br />THE PROPOSED WATER RESOURCES PLANNING ACT <br /> <br />by <br /> <br />, <br />"" <br /> <br />Ivai V. Goslin <br /> <br />(based on S. 1111 as passed by U.S. Senate 12/4/63) <br /> <br />The title to S. 1111 describes the purpose of the proposed legislation <br />by saying that it is "a Bill to provide for the optimum development of the Nation's <br />natural resources through the coordinated planning of water and related land <br />resources, through the establishment of a water resources council and river <br />basin commissions, and by providing financial assistance to the States in <br />order to increase State partiCipation in such planning." From the title I believe <br />it would be fair to say that S. 1111 represents an attempt to provide Congres- <br />Sionally-approved administrative policy and operative machinery to implement <br />a comprehensive baSin-wide concept of planning the development of our <br />nation's water and related land resources. By some, this definition may be <br />thought to be too restrictive; by others, too broad. <br /> <br />The idea of comprehensive river basin planning is not new. This <br />concept was recognized early by those interested in the conservation and <br />utilization of our natural resources as a method that would provide the <br />optimum in benefits to the most people for the longest time. The first <br />official expression of this idea may have been that of President Theodore <br />Roosevelt's Inland Waterways Commission in 1908. Since that time, <br />as all of you know, many economic and social forces related to our rapidly <br />increasing population and high standards of living have caused our planners <br />to look again and again at the manner in which we are utilizing our resources <br />in order to devise ways of deriving optimum benefits therefrom, and, at the <br />same time enhancing their conservation. <br /> <br />The more recent incentives for comprehensive, basin-wide, water <br />resources, planning legislation have undoubtedly sprung from the seeds <br />planted by the Hoover Commission report which in 1955 proposed the creation <br />of a Water Resources Board to set up basin commissions to represent Fed8ral, <br />state, and private interests; various studies and reports of the Federal and <br />State Governments directly concerned with water conservation projects; the <br />report of the V.S, Senate Select. Committee on National Water Resources in <br />1961; the recent lawsuit, Arizona v. California whleh gave impetus to th", <br />Pacific Southwest Water Plan; activities of many National and State organiz- <br />ations, including the Council of State Governments; and the general public's <br />growing awareness of the seriousness of water problems--locally, State- <br />wide, and nationally. <br />