Laserfiche WebLink
<br />HISTORY <br /> <br />The Southeastern Colorado Water <br />Conservancy District was created <br /><::> under Colorado State Statutes on <br />o April 29, 1958 by the District Coun in <br />~ Pueblo, Colorado. It embraces ~r <br />(,Q 300,000 acres of irrigable land in <br />W 26,150 sq~are miles in the Arkan.sa.s <br />tlt Rrver BaSin, with a population ot <br />approximately 600,000 people. <br />Included are small rural towns, cities <br />in excess of 250,000 people, and <br />agricultural areas ranging from very <br />small farms 10 large ranching opera- <br />tions. It truly is represenlative of <br />"Rural America" where the agricultural <br />secto~ are suffering out-migration and <br />the larger melropolitan areas are facing <br />problems common to growing areas. <br /> <br />The citizens in the Arkansas Valley <br />realized that a well managed water <br />supply held the key to the future <br />growth and prosperity of the Basin, <br />and, as a result of this sincere convic- <br />tion, petitioned the District Court in <br />Pueblo for permission to form a Waler <br />Conservancy District. The movement <br />actually started as early as 1922, when <br />citizens from farms and cities joined <br />together to discuss wa~ to not only <br />manage existing decreed water sup- <br />plies, but also to obtain other wolters <br />in COlorddo to which they were legally <br />entitled under State Law and Compacts. <br /> <br />The Diwict has grown in population <br />since its creation. dnd also in valua- <br />tion. When formed in 1958 it had an <br />assessed vdluation of slightly less than <br />S400 million. The assessed valuation <br />in 1990 was $3,399,123.060. The <br />reduction in the assessed valuation <br />was caused 1:7,' a change in Colorado <br />Property Tax Laws, which required a <br />re-evaluation of all property in the <br />state. Several of the counties also <br />reported a decline in over-all assessed <br />valuation due to loss of population. <br /> <br />GOVER~MENT OF THE <br />DISTRICT <br /> <br />Colorado State Statutes provide that <br />Water Conservancy Districts shall be <br />under the direction of a Board of <br />Directors representing the area sel'\led <br />by the District. When the District <br />Court in Pueblo credted me Southeastem <br />Colorado Water Conservancy District <br />in 1958. II ruled that edch of the nine <br />Counlies in the District would h~ <br />tv.'o dppoinled Directors, with the <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />exception that Prowe~ and Kiowa <br />Counlies would be represented by one <br />person. Olher Counties represented <br />are: Chaffee, Fremont, EI Paso, Pueblo. <br />Otero, Crowley and Bent. <br /> <br />The membe~ of the Board are <br />obligated to carry out the provisions <br />in state statutes and such other agree- <br />ments and contracts as are entered <br />into in the conduct ot business in the <br />interest of presenl and future citizens <br />served boy' the District. It is important <br />to note that the boundaries of Ihe <br />District do not represent the entire <br />counties. but only those ponions <br />where citizens petitioned the Coun <br />to become a part of the District. <br /> <br />Statutes also provide that the District <br />shall be under the legal jurisdiction of <br />a District Coun, and the Southeastern <br />Colorado Water Conservancy District <br />is under the jurisdiction of Division A, <br />10th Judicial District, located in Pueblo, <br />Colorado. The Honorable John R. <br />Tracey, Presiding Judge for Division A <br />in Pueblo, retains jurisdiction over ap- <br />pointment of Directors and other legal <br />matters invulving the District. <br /> <br />A major change took place in the <br />appointment of members of Bodrds of <br />Directors of Conservancy Districts <br />throughout the State of Colorado <br />during 1985. Early in the legislati~ <br />Session members of the Colorado <br />General Assembly heard detailed <br />testimony regarding Senate Bill 141, <br />which would change the way in <br />which members of the Boards of <br />Directors were either appointed or <br />eleded. and the basis for their <br />seledion. After many amendments <br />and extensi~ dewte, Senate Bill 141 <br />was passed and signed by the <br />Honorable Richard D. lamm, <br />Governor, on June 6, 1985. <br /> <br />The Bill authorized that the Presiding <br />Judge in Pueblo County would consult <br />with the Presiding District Judge in <br />each Judicial Diwict represented by <br />the Southeastern District, and would <br />appoint persons tram those who make <br />formal application for consideration. <br /> <br />The new legislation requires that <br />appointments be made based upon <br />population within individual counties, <br />and counties with less Ihan one <br />percent would be excluded from <br />having a member on the Bodrd. This <br />would change the composition of the <br /> <br />Board over a period of four years by <br />reducing the representation from <br />Chaffee, Fremont, Otero, Bent and <br />Crowley Counties from two Directors <br />to one, and increasing the representa- <br />tion from El Paso County from two to <br />fi~ Diredors, and Pueblo County <br />itom two to three. Senate Bill 141 <br />also provided that the new legislation <br />could be instituted by legal enhties <br />within the District petitioning the <br />court. or petitions being filed with an <br />appropriate number of signatures. <br /> <br />On August 13, 1985, the City of <br />Colorado Springs and the Pueblo <br />Board of Water \\brb filed <br />appropriate petitions with the District <br />Court requesting that the prO'Jisions oi <br />Senate Bill 141 be implemented in <br />the Southeastern Colorado \^I.3;ter <br />Conservancy Oistrict. The Honorable <br />Richard D. Robb held several hearings <br />on the petitions, giving representati-..es <br />from Chaffee. Fremont and Kiowa <br />Counties the opponunities to express <br />concern over the loss of members of <br />the Board. AMer due consideration, he <br />ruled on December 11. 1985 that the <br />provisions of Senate Bill 141 should <br />apply to the District. He then pro- <br />mulgated a procedure whereby <br />appointments in 1986 would conform <br />with those provisions. <br /> <br />In accordance with the provisions of <br />Senate Bill 141 and the Court Order <br />issued December 11, 1985, on April <br />17, 1990 the Honorable John R. Tracey. <br />Tenth Judicial District in Pueblo, along <br />with District Judges Donald E. Camp- <br />bell, Fourth Judicial District in <br />Colorado Springs; Jon Kolomitz, <br />Sixteenth Judicial District in La Junta; <br />Edward Schlatter, Eleventh Judicial <br />District in Canon City, and Norman l. <br />Arends, Fifteenth Judicial District in <br />Lamar; appointed the following to the <br />Board of Directors: <br /> <br />1990 . 1994 <br /> <br />Denzel Goodwin. Fremont <br />Ralph Adkins. Pueblo <br />David Sarton . EI Paso <br />Robert Schrader - El Paso <br />Thomas R. Paimon - Bent <br /> <br />1988 . t992 <br /> <br />Raymond D. Nixon - El Paso <br />Gibson Hazard - EI Paso <br />Roben E. Northrup - ProwE"rs <br />Alan C. Hamel. Pueblo <br />Carl G. Genova. At Large <br />