Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />partial solution to the fully protected species issue (i.e., Assembly Bill 2795). Director Hight offered <br />to continue the dialog and information sharing over the next month or so as the legislative session <br />gears up. Because of the need to finalize the California's Colorado River Water Use Plan in 2001 <br />and the MSCP by Spring 2002, it is imperative that the Fish and Game Code be amended during this <br />legislative session. <br /> <br />Status of the Lawsuit in Defenders of Wildlife, et al. v. Babbitt, et al. <br /> <br />As the Board is aware, U.S. District Court Judge James Robertson, on October 13, 2000, <br />denied the Lower Basin states' and water and power agencies motions to intervene. Arizona, <br />California and Nevada have filed notices of motions to appeal the Judge's decision and order. The <br />California Attorney General's Office filed a notice of appeal on October 31, 2000. Additionally, the <br />plaintiffs and defendants recently met and developed a schedule for disposition of the matter. <br />According to the current schedule, discovery is anticipated to be completed by March-April 2001, <br />with the trial projected to occur during the Summer of 200 I. <br /> <br />Lower Colorado Water Supplv Proiect <br /> <br />As reported at the September Board meeting, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) issued its <br />final report for the "accounting surface" from Laguna Dam to the Southerly International Boundary. <br />I have included in the Board folder, for your infonnation, a copy of the USGS fact sheet entitled <br />Identifying Wells Downstreamfrom Laguna Dam that Yield Water that will be Replaced by Water <br />from the Colorado River, which summarizes the final report. The Board staff will be holding a <br />meeting, in late November or early December, with representatives of the Board's agencies to <br />discuss the USGS report, its possible effect on the Lower Colorado Water Supply Project, current <br />status of the Project, and future activities. <br /> <br />WESTERN WATER PLANNING <br /> <br />Glen Canvon Adaptive Management <br /> <br />The Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program Technical Work Group (TWG) met <br />in Phoenix, Arizona, on November 6-7, 2000. The TWG recommended that the Adaptive <br />Management Work Group, approve the Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center's (GCMRC) <br />annual work plan and Fiscal Year 2002 budget of $7.58 million. Of this amount, approximately <br />$6.576 million would come from Colorado River Storage Project power revenues, and the remainder <br />from the USGS' agency budget. As you will recall, the GCMRC was recently transferred from <br />Reclamation to the USGS. <br /> <br />Additionally, there were infonnational reports from several ad hoc subcommittees dealing <br />with clarification of the GCMRC's management objectives and research infonnation needs. Finally, <br />the Western Area Power Administration (Western) reported preliminary data, which indicated that <br />Glen Canyon Dam operations during summer 2000 resulted in Colorado River Storage Project <br />customers having to purchase approximately $16 million of additional electrical energy from the <br /> <br />6 <br />