Laserfiche WebLink
<br />21 <br /> <br />30 <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />provision or reference to the Alamo Oanal in Mexico. I take it <br /> <br /> <br />there is no reference to that whatever in this proposal? <br /> <br /> <br />MR. OLAYTON: No, there isn't, Judge. Under the <br /> <br /> <br />alternate proposals,'one'of the alternate proposals is that the <br /> <br /> <br />United States can acquire the District's works at Andrade withi <br /> <br />I, <br /> <br />the United states. Nothing is said about the measure of compen <br />sation to be paid for those works. It may be that when we <br /> <br />""'A'"""""",,,,,_' - <br />enter negotiations ~ we will find that element is included; <br />I /!.1fro1 <br />and if we do, it may be that we , have to have recourse to <br />condemnation proceedings to settle that point. But that is not <br />yet in issue. It is not included in the proposal. <br />OHAIRMAN STONE: Jlnother question: This whole matter <br />is related to thecon1;ra6t made by the Department of the Interin' <br />with the Imperial Irrigation District. Are you in a position <br /> <br />, <br />to state what the attitude of the Department of the Interior is <br />with respect to the modification of that contract to comply wit~ <br />the Treaty? <br />MR. OLAYTON: Only as I have been able to glean that <br />attitude from our conferences with the Bureau of Reclamation <br />and the Department of the Interior. I understand that Mr. Will, <br />the Assistant Chief Counsel of the Bureau of Reclamation, is he"e <br />and perhaps he can speak on that point better than I can. <br /> <br />, <br />MR. WILL: No, I cannot, Mr. Clayton. That has been <br />handled by other counsel in the Bureau. ' <br />MR. CLAYTON: I may say on that point--and I don't <br />intend to infringe on the Bureau of Reclamation at all, Mr. <br />Will--as I understand the attitude of the Department of the <br />