My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP12077
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
12000-12999
>
WSP12077
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:19:48 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:22:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8410.350
Description
Platte River Basin - Basin Multistate Organizations - Missouri Basin IAC
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
12/14/1962
Author
George T Omalley Jr
Title
Land Easements for Recreation - MBIAC 128 th Meeting
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. .. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />0028;14 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />.., <br /> <br />-5- <br /> <br />conneotion with the rights involved here .for several reasons. The term <br />can oorrectly be applied to only one of the three alternatives above. <br />There is always the danger that common law rules of interpretation will <br />be applied, particularly in any situation involving hardship, or perhaps <br />mere vagueness. These rights should therefore be referred to by some <br />other term, as "conservation rights and interests" or "statutory rights <br />and interests, as herein defined." Rights and interests are not only <br />legally correct descriptions .for all three alternatives, but they are <br />neutral terms without any special technical implications. In choosing <br />the name, consideration should be given to the effect on standard provis- <br />ions in real estate contracts which refer tr rights and interests of <br />various kinds. <br /> <br />Specific prov1s1on should be made to disclaim the more important and <br />troublesome rules deriving from common law easement dootrine. It should <br />be explicitly provided that none of the rights involved are to be automati- <br />cally extinguished without oompensation, and the rights should be made <br />tranSferable, both between private parties and between different levels of <br />government. Separate provision should be made for release of publicly held <br />rights, or in proper circumstances for their transfer between public <br />agencies involving a probable change in land use. <br /> <br />The prooedure should be designed to require full consideration of the <br />planning elements inv~lved and should make release possible but not easy. <br />If the land is to be transferred to another government agency, particularly <br />for a change in land use, that agency should be required to pay for or pro- <br />vide equivalent open space elsewhere. <br /> <br />Tho statute should require that the division of rights be rooorded in <br />order to bind subsequont purchasers of the privately ~wned rights. <br /> <br />Provision should be made for modifying tax assessments to reflect <br />present and oontinuing non-intensive land use. <br /> <br />Tho enabling law should tie development of such recreational areas into <br />overall planning. Federal and State financial aids Should be available for <br />such local programs and should be conditioned upon the existence of a genuine <br />planning procoss. <br /> <br />Reference: ORRRC Study Report 16 "Land Acquisition for Outdoor Recreation <br />Analysis of Selected Legal Problems" <br />Report by Norman J .vlilliams, Jr. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.