Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />'''''0 ':j <br />UJt.oL, <br />-4- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />4. The various possibilities of automatic termination of the <br />easement rights, without notice and without compensation. <br /> <br />5. The various administrative difficulties which result from split <br />ownership. <br /> <br />Appurtenant easements are the most common form of easements and the <br />requirement of a dominant tenement is the principal legal characteristic of <br />an appurtenant easement. If there is no dominant tenement--and no overall <br />statutory scheme spelling out the nature of the new right--legal trouble <br />may ensue. If recreation easements are required on land isolated from <br />agency land holdings must normally be either easements in gross or some <br />wholly new form of legal right and interest. If such easements are considered <br />as easements in gross, in the traditional form--without special statutory <br />definition--several types of legal problems may arise. Easements in gross <br />are generally regarded as rather limited and weak form of legal interest <br />in land. Major questions arise on their assignability and on the possi- <br />bility of their termination. If easement restrictions are assignable, <br />the problem is how to bind subsequent purchasers of the fee to respect <br />the rights under the easement. A statute authorizing the acquisition of <br />such easements should specifically require that they be recorded. <br /> <br />The subject of possible termination of the easement should be thor- <br />oughly studied. In order to eliminate any administrative difficulties in <br />enforoemElnt, the respective rights should be clearly defined. <br /> <br />Enabling Legislation: <br /> <br />Guide lines for enabling legislation. In so far as possible the <br />major problem should be worked out at the period of statutory drafting, <br />rather than being left to eventual resolution by the parties in litigation. <br />The statute should set forth at length a'list of the major rights to use <br />land which will be involved. The statute should authorize three different <br />and alternative methods of splitting up the various rights as between <br />public and private ownership: <br /> <br />1. Conveyance of certain stated rights by the private owner to a <br />public agency, with the private owner retaining the fee; i.e., <br />the typical situation of public acquisition of an "easement". <br /> <br />2. Publio acquisition of the fee and lease-back to a private owner <br />of oertain stated rights over the land or, alternatively, public <br />issuance of a special use permit for the same purpose. <br /> <br />3. Public acquisition of the fee and reconveyance to the former <br />private owner of a new type of legal interest in land, con- <br />sisting of whatever rights are specifically reconveyed. This <br />interest should specifically be made assignable and devisable; <br />i.e., it can both be sold and inherited. <br /> <br />The Government should hold its rights as a separate entity and not as <br />a trustee for the population at large. Provision should be made for carry- <br />ing out any of these arrangements by gift, purchase, or oondemnation, as <br />appropriate. It would be preferable not to use the word "easement" in <br />