Laserfiche WebLink
<br />III-10 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />however, at some sites where the thermal effects would not be objectionable. <br />Dry cooling towers were selected at sites where cooling water supplies are <br />critically short and the value of generation at the site may justify the large <br />expense. Dry cooling towers are assumed to require negligible volumes of <br />water. <br /> <br />In the case of plants using cooling water from ground water sources, it <br />is assumed that return flows would be returned to either fresh or saline water <br />bodies or, in some desert areas, to be placed on the ground to evaporate. <br />Steam used for generation purposes at geothermal plants is assumed to be <br />returned to the ground after condensation to avoid subsidence, Cool ing water <br />used in the process is included in estimates of water use, <br /> <br />Hydroelectric Plant Water Use <br /> <br />The average annual generation in each ASA during 1975, 1985 and 2000 by <br />the hydroelectric power plants and the average turbine flows producing the <br />generation were estimated, assuming average and dry year conditions. Dry <br />year conditions are only shown where hydroelectric generation is approximately <br />20 percent or more of the total generation in the ASA. <br /> <br />Where more than one stream within an ASA includes hydroelectric plants, <br />the average turbine flows of the plants in each of the streams have been <br />aggregated to determine the flow utilized within the ASA, Where a single <br />stream within an ASA includes a series of plants, only the largest turbine <br />flow has been listed. Other plants in the series would also utilize portions <br />of that flow. <br /> <br />National Parks, Fish Hatcheries, BLM Lands, and National Forests <br /> <br />One has to wonder why these categories were included in the National <br />Assessment. Water consumed in national park areas in the region totals to <br />only two MGD annually - an insignificant amount of water. National fish <br />hatcheries require water withdrawals, but no water is consumed. The estimates <br />for BLM lands include water consumed by wildlife, which for the region repre- <br />sents about 60 percent of total water consumed on BLM lands. BLM lands <br />constitute only' about six percent of the total basin lands, Water consumed <br />by wildlife on the remaining 94 percent of lands is not accounted for. <br />Water use accounted for on national forest lands is for recreation and <br />miscellaneous uses. The amounts of water are not significant. The Missouri <br />Basin Framework Report lists watershed protection projects as depleting <br />average annual streamf10ws by about 300 MGD. These depletions are about 50 <br />percent greater than the depletions on national parks, BLM and national forest <br />lands, which account for only about 1.4 percent of the total water consumed <br />in the region. Of the total of about 220 MGD consumed on public lands, about <br />60 MGD or over 25 percent is attributed to wildlife consumption of water, <br /> <br />Man-Made Evaporation <br /> <br />Evaporation losses from man-made impoundments for the National Assessment <br />modified central case for the Missouri region are those computed for the <br />Framework Report. These estimates were also used in the SRF. <br />