Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2914 <br /> <br />ii <br /> <br />5. Presentation of written statements or petitions to be considered by the <br />Conservation Board. <br /> <br />6. Presentation of oral statements, extemporaneous or prepared, by <br />individuals on attitude toward Narrows Unit. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />The morning session of each meeting uas devoted to remarks Qy Judge Stone, <br />presentation of the Bureau of Reclamation plan, and discussions by R. J. Tipton. <br />The general public participated in the afternoon session. <br /> <br />At each day's session, Judge Stone was introduced by a local resident. On <br />::ieptember 13, he was introduced by Mr. George A. t;pperson, attorney in Fort Morgan; <br />on beptember 14, by Mr. R. J. Wright, ::iuperintendent of North Sterling, Iliff and <br />Logan Irrigation District; and on September IS, by Mr. J. M. Dille, Secretary- <br />Manager of the Northern Colorado liater Conservancy District. <br /> <br />I. Judge Stone's remarks at th~ hearings concerning the purposes of the <br />public hearings on the Narrows Unit and his comments on this proposed development <br />are summariz.ed in the following paragraphs: <br /> <br />These hearings were authorized by the Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />to give the Bureau of Reclamation an opportunity to present to the people who <br />might be directly affected by, or interested in, the Narrows Unit, its plan of <br />development for that Unit; to secure for the Colorado liater Conservation Board <br />with respect to the Narrows Unit the ideas and comments as well as the general <br />attitude of the people living in the area; to aid the Board in the preparation <br />of its official recommendations and comments on the project for submittal to the <br />Bureau of Reclamation. He explained that it is the policy of the Board to hold <br />public meetings whenever there are questions concerning a project and, further, <br />that the Board and not Judge Stone makes final detec',":.aation as to the desirability <br />of a project. ' <br /> <br />Floods in the !,lissouri River Basin in 1947 brought about the decision of the <br />Government to include the lJarrows Unit in a program of early construction. It <br />had been previously authorized as a part of the plan of develo,ment of the Missouri <br />River Basin. Because of the conservation as~ects involved, the Bureau of Recla- <br />mation was given the responsibility of its construction. The Board recogniz.ed <br />the necessity for the construction of storage on the lower South Platte, but was <br />not satisfied as to the exact location, capacity, plan of operation, and was <br />anxious to avoid arid, if possible, eliminate the resultant inundation of ~eldon <br />Valley. From preliminary studies, the Bureau had selected the Narrows site for the <br />dam. The Board, however, encouraged the investigation and further study of alter- <br />nate sites. The Board had the full cooperation of the Bureau in these more exten- <br />sive studies and has had an opportunity to review these studies from time to time <br />as the investigation progressed. SUlllIllaries of the present plan have been prepared <br />by the Bureau of Reclamation, copies of which were mailed by the Conservation <br />Board to interested persons prior to this hearing. <br /> <br />In addition to objections raised by the Board, certain irrigation interests <br />raised questions, or a "red flag", as to the necessity for the reservoir, and its <br />