Laserfiche WebLink
<br />n""1~? <br />u U (, .~ U"A <br /> <br />for meteorological conditions on January 12, 1984. This same <br />day is used to estiJrate maximum one hour and eight hour <br />carbon monoxide impacts, since the highest one hour and eight <br />hour average TSP concentration are also calculated by the <br />model on this day. Fireplaces and woodstwes account for the <br />majority of the CO emissions and therefore, the diurnal (l) <br />emissions profile closely follows the diurnal TSP emissions <br />profile. Thus, the highest CO impact estiJrates provided by <br />the Box Model should occur on the same day as the highest TSP <br />impact. Table IV-ll summarizes the maximum one hour and <br />eight hour carbon monoxide impacts at Wolf Creek Valley. The <br />highest one hour and eight hour impacts are estimated in BOx <br />3 at 5495 ug/m per cubic foot and 3,070 ug/m per cubic foot, <br />respectively. Representative background CO levels (Latimer <br />et aI, 1983) of 2,500 ug/rn per cubic foot (one hour) and <br />1,500 ug/m per cubic foot (eight hour) added to these <br />estimates to result in ambient (l) concentrations for <br />comparison with Colorado and tational ambient air quality <br />standards. The ambient (l) concentration estimates of 7,995 <br />ug/rn per cubic foot for the one !lour average and 4,570 ug/m <br />per cubic foot for t!le eight hour average are well below the <br />ambient standard of 40,000 ug/m per cubic foot (one hour) and <br />10,000 ug/m per cubic foot (eight hour) (see Table 111-13) . <br /> <br />TAf[,E IV-ll <br /> <br />CIIRm1iI M:>RlXmE <D~M'ION F..Cn'JMM'R!:: <br />Nr VT.F rRRMr UlJ.r,RV <br /> <br />Box <br />I <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br /> <br />.1 <br />Carbon Ibnoxide Concentrations (ug/m ) <br />1 Hour 8 Hour <br />219 47 <br />4959 2897 <br />5494 3070 <br />4717 2480 <br /> <br />(3) Visual Air Ouality <br /> <br />The impact of fine particulate emissions on the visual air <br />quality of Wolf Creek Valley is of concern due to the <br />excellent visibility of the area, the long scenic vistas from <br />the surrounding mountains and the importance of clear air to <br />the overall liveability and enjoyment of this area. <br />Woodstoves and fireplaces emit fine particulates which cause <br />light to be scattered and can result in a visible haze and a <br />reduction in visual range*. In this case, pa~ticulate levels <br />in the valley during early morning or late afternoon (when <br />concentrations are expected to be at their highest levels <br />during daylight hours) could result in a visible haze layer. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />Visual range is the farthest distance that a black <br />object is perceptible against the horizon sky. <br /> <br />187 <br />