My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11850
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11850
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:19:05 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:13:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8510.100.40
Description
Rio Grande Compact Commission
Basin
Rio Grande
Water Division
3
Date
5/1/1974
Title
San Luis Valley Water Problems: A Legal Perspective - Part II of II
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />C-3 <br /> <br />l. ,., <br />l <br /> <br />~, <br />o <br />(;, <br /> <br />The Water Court has considered through this date numerous applications <br /> <br />under the Water Right Determination and Administration Act of 1969, C.R.S. 1973, <br /> <br />(As Amended) 37-92~101, et seq., Cases totalin9 3,558 have been filed request- <br /> <br />ing adjudication for 11,996 wells. Decrees of adjudication have been entered <br /> <br />affecting 9216 wells, leaving 2,780 wells presently undecided. The location <br />of such underground sources from court records and the adjudicated flows <br /> <br />therefrom give insight into the enormity of the problems. Approximately 95% <br /> <br />of all beneficial economical crop irrigation in the San Luis Valley is <br />directly dependent upon supplemental irrigation waters from underground <br /> <br />sources, if the adjudication records, locations and uses of previously determined <br /> <br />cases are valid. The Proposed Rules and Regulations would in substance <br />dispense with'any needed further consideration of pending cases because by <br />the year 1981 there would be. a total cessation of the use of "pumped" irrigation <br />wells. The State Engineer has classified drains and other similar structures <br />obtaining underground water for beneficial use in the same category as wells <br />so they would be similarly affected without regard to priority or location. <br />The Rules and Regulations have been carefully examined with specific <br />reference to the statutes which provide for their promulgation. Such is <br />necessitated at the onset because the Court can readily perceive that the water <br />users of this division are expending horrendous sums of money in the preparation <br />'for hearings, evidentiary compilations, expert witnesses and legal expense. <br /> <br />The Court has an option to first conduct hearings and then determine the entire <br />issue, both factually and legally. On the other hand, if such Rules and <br />Regulations are so legally deficient as to obviate the necessity of such ex- <br />tended evidentiary hearings, then the Court should recognize this at an early <br />date and thereby spare the State and the Objecting water users of this division <br />this expense which no doubt will entail the expenditure of thousands of dollars. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.