Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />, <br />I <br /> <br />o <br />,.~ <br />w <br />..... <br />..... <br />--J <br /> <br />26 <br /> <br />DEPLETION OF SURFACE WATER SUPPLIES <br /> <br />tremendous capital investment which must be made to industrialize <br />the region and which will not be made until there is assurance of ample <br />water. <br /> <br />FUTURE TRANSMOUNTAIN DIVERSIONS <br /> <br />The supply of waterfrom Colorado River which was allocated to Colo~ <br />rado has already been depleted to the extent of 388,000 acre-feet per <br />year because of transmountain diversions; commitments for increased <br />diversions through existing facilities would bring the total up to <br />503,000 acre-feet per year. Although there are few opportunities <br />for the diversion of still more water across the Continental Divide, <br />a very large quantity of water could be taken if there were no legal <br />nor economic barriers to these potential projects. <br />The proposal of Denver to divert the waters of Blue River into <br />the South Platte drainage basin is now in litigation in both the State <br />and Federal courts. No opinion can be expressed as to the legal <br />rights of Denver or any other agency to make new or increased trans- <br />mountain diversions. <br />New transmountain diversions will be limited generally to the <br />headwaters of the main stem of Colorado River and to the Gunnison <br />River drainage basin above the head of Black Canyon. Some water <br />could be diverted from Yampa River into the headwaters of North <br />Platte River but this is improbable because the use would be only <br />for agricultural purposes. Neither White River nor Dolores River <br />extends back to the Continental Divide. Allowance has already been <br />made for existing and authorized diversions from San Juan River <br />into the head of Rio Grande. <br /> <br />'.' <br /> <br />:~<~:7 <br />,~..'s <br /> <br /> <br />DIVERSIONS FROM COLORADO RIVER .llASIN <br /> <br />Transmountl1in diversions through existing facilities above Hot <br />Sulphur Springs could be 400,000 acre-feet per year. This is about <br />350,000 acre-feet in excess of the diversions which were made during <br />the years 1939 to 1949, the period of less than average runoff which <br />determines the safe yield of the stream. This safe yield,' !tfter reser- <br />o voir evaporation losses, is only 420,000 acre-feet per year, leaving <br />. about 20,000 acre-feet per year for maintenance of a. live stream, <br />Hence, there is no opportunity for, increasing transmountain diver- <br />sions from the watershed of Colorado River above Hot Sulphur <br />Springs except to the extent of the allowances already made for <br />present and committed uses. <br />Two plans for transmountain diversions from Blue River and <br />o adjacent streams have been advanced. The United States Bureau <br />of Reclamation contemplates the diversion of 430,000 acre-feet per <br />year, which would be obtained from Blue River and Williams River, <br />. augmented by diversions into Blue River from Eagle River and other <br />: streams on the west side of the Gore Range. The city and county of <br />Denver proposes the diversion of 177,000 acre-feet per year from <br />Blue River and Williams River alone. It would be physically possible <br />to carry out either of these plans, but not both. <br />. Colorado Springs is already taking water out of the basin above <br />. the proposed points of diversion from Blue River. Hence, the fore- <br />igoing estimates of the Bureau of Reclamation and of Denver may <br />have to be reduced about 17,000 acre-feet per year. <br /> <br />;', <br /> <br />Jr <br /> <br />:.". <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />,~. <br />