My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11823
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11823
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:18:59 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:11:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8281.400
Description
Colorado River Studies and Investigations -- Colorado River Depletion Projections
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
3/25/1955
Title
Report on Depletion of Surface Water Supplied of Colorado West of Continental Divide
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />o <br />.::") <br />w <br />... <br />... <br />en <br /> <br />DEPLETION OF SURFACE WATER SUPPLIES <br /> <br />25 <br /> <br /> <br />The i population of the east bay cities is approximately that for <br />which provision should be made on the western slope and the popula- <br />t.ion of, t.he Los Angeles area is very much great.er. It. is reasonable <br />t.o assume, therefore, that while diversion requirements for indust.rial <br />and municipal purposes on t.he west.ern slope of Colorado may be quite <br />large, t.he act.ual consumption of water resulting in depletion of stream- <br />flows sh.ould not exceed 1 acre-foot per year for each 10 persons. <br />In other words, allowance for the consumption of 100,000 acre-feet <br />per yeat in addition to the actual consumption of water in the mining <br />and processing of oil shale should be ample to cover all other industries <br />and the,uses of the population supported by all industries. <br />It is t<hus unlikely that stream depletions resulting from full indus- <br />trialization will amount to more than 200,000 acre-feet per year; allow- <br />ance for depletions aggregating 300,000 acre-feet per year would cer- <br />tainly provide ample margin for any conceivable development stem- <br />ming fro.m processing of the shale oil reserves, and be enough to cover <br />any probable use of the coal deposits. <br /> <br />~ .: <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />NEED FOR STORAGE OF FLOOD WATERS <br /> <br />Undllrpresent condit.ions, very lit.t.le water would be available during <br />the irrigation season to satisfy the diversion requirement.s of industry. <br />The nat.ural flow of the rivers is already being used to its utmost to <br />serve lands under irrigation, except during the winter months when <br />t.he demand for water is insignificant and except during the period of <br />snow melt when the rivers are in flood. Hence, conservation of flood <br />flows by storage in reservoirs will be necessary to satisfy even a small <br />industrial' demand. <br />The only existing reservoir which might be used for this purpose is <br />Green Mountain Reservoir on Blue River constructed by the United <br />States as part of the Colorado-Big Thompson project. The diversion <br />requirements of the oil shale industry itself might be satisfied by re- <br />leases from this reservoir but the far greater requirements of the other <br />industries' could not be so met. The additional storage reservoirs <br />which will: be needed do not have to be located upstream from Rifle; <br />on the cOI~trary, there would be considerable advantage in having a <br />large reservoir in the immediate vicinity of the potential industrial <br />area. <br />: Opportunity exists for the creation of a suitable reservoir by con- <br />structionof a dam in De Beque Canyon at the lower end of the valley <br />within which the industrial development would presumably be cen- <br />tered. Diyersion requirements of such industries could be satisfied <br />by the withdrawal of water from the reservoir without regard to the <br />inflow at the time. Return waters, except the very small proportion <br />which might be unduly contaminated by chemical processes,could be <br />returned to the same reservoir without waste downstream. All <br />irrigation requirements in the Grand Junction area could be satisfied, <br />without corltlict with any other use, by the release of water from the <br />reservoir, and the average quality of the irrigation water would be <br />somewhat improved over that )Jow available in the summer months. <br />lt is recognized that the cost of construction of such a storage <br />project would be large, primarily because of the necessity of relocating <br />the trunk h~ghway and railroad which now follow Colorado River. <br />This!cost, however, would be insignificant in comparison to the <br /> <br /> <br />i~. <br />i_' , <br />:' . ~- . <br />, <br /> <br />~ " <br />'- <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.