My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11780
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11780
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:18:50 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:10:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8443.400
Description
Narrows Unit - Reports
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
5/1/1973
Author
US DoI BoR
Title
Narrows Unit Definite Plan Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Definite Plan Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />r <br /> <br />.<'! r-,..,- <br />10,,;,::. <br /> <br />The comparative direct and total benefit-cost ratios derived for <br />the 1969 Reevaluation Statement and the Definite Plan Report (DPR) <br />are presented below. <br /> <br />Item <br /> <br />1969 Reevaluation <br />statement <br /> <br />1973 DPR <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />Direct benefits only <br />Total benefits <br /> <br />1. 81 <br />1. 89 <br /> <br />1.30 <br />1.42 <br /> <br />Financial Analysis <br /> <br />Cost AlIocat ion <br /> <br />Discounted project costs, interest durin~ construction, and OM&R <br />costs have been allocated concurrently by the separable costs- <br />remaining benefits method, using a 100-year period of analysis <br />with interest at 3-1/4 percent. The allocation to highway improve- <br />ment is limited to that portion of separable costs of construction <br />to current standards which exceed the cost of replacement in kind <br />as provided by Section 208 of the 1962 Flood Control Act (Public <br />Law 87-874). <br /> <br />The derivation of separable and joint costs is presented in Table 'I. <br />The detailed cost allocation is presented in Table 5. A comparison <br />of the allocations of undiscounted costs for the 1969 Reevaluation <br />Statement and the DPR is given in Table 3. <br /> <br />Table 3.--Comparison of allocations of undiscounted costs <br />($1,000) <br />Project Costs Annual OM&R <br />1969 Reeval- 1973 1969 Reeval- 1973 <br />Purpose at ion statement DPR ation statement DPR <br /> <br />Irrigation <br />Flood control <br />Highway improvement <br />Recreation <br />Fish & Wildlife <br />Local <br />National <br /> <br />Total <br /> <br />21 ,121. 'I 28,603.0 17.1 20.3 <br />24,350.1 31,287.0 14.0 15.4 <br />135.0 186.0 0.0 0.0 <br />15,815.5 21,254.0 185.2 212.6 <br />6,628.0 8,420.0 97.1 111.7 <br />(5,712.4) (7,299.0) (96.7) ( 111. 4 ) <br />(915.6) (1,121.0 (0.4) (0.3) <br /> - <br />68,050.0 89,750.0 313.4 360.0 <br /> <br />16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.