Laserfiche WebLink
<br />c".) <br />c".) <br />N <br />0). <br /> <br />Figure <br /> <br />5,10. <br /> <br />5.11. <br /> <br />5.12. <br /> <br />LIST OF FIGURES (GONTINUED) <br /> <br /> <br />Page <br /> <br />Comparison of canal diversions for the period <br />1970-1972 for the Grand Valley, Colorado, area <br />between the base calibration and the best run <br />(# 46) from Management Alternative 7 . . . <br /> <br />Predicted outflow response for the period <br />1970-1972 for Management Alternative 8 of <br />a) water, b) salt, and c) salinity concen- <br />tration (T05) to changes in canal conveyance <br />efficiency at a constant field application <br />efficiency of 66 percent . . . . . . . . . . <br /> <br />69 <br /> <br />71 <br /> <br />Comparison of canal diversions for the period <br />1970-1972 for the Grand Valley, Golorado, area <br />between the base calibration and the best run <br />(#50) from Management Alternative 8. , , . . . <br /> <br />72 <br /> <br />ix <br />