Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />CJ.) <br />CJ.) <br />N <br />Ut <br /> <br />Figure <br /> <br />LIST OF FIGURES (CONTINUED) <br /> <br />Sensitivity of the field application efficiency <br />of the Grand Valley, Colorado, irrigation system <br />to changes in a) operational spills, b) canal <br />conveyance system efficiency, c) reduction in <br />canal diversions, and d) tail water runoff <br /> <br />Schematic diagrams of two different possible <br />representations of the Grand Valley, Colorado, <br />irrigation system. <br /> <br />4.9. Interrelationship between a reduction of <br />historical canal diversions for the 1970-1972 <br />water years and an increase in canal conveyance <br />efficiency for GV system I <br /> <br />4,7. <br /> <br />4,8. <br /> <br />4.10. Relative sensitivity of system 1 and system 2, <br />Grand Valley, Colorado, deep percolation to <br />changes in canal conveyance efficiency and <br />reductions in canal diver ions. <br /> <br />5,1. <br /> <br />5,2. <br /> <br />5.3, <br /> <br />5,4. <br /> <br />5.5, <br /> <br />5.6. <br /> <br />5.7, <br /> <br />5.8, <br /> <br />5,9. <br /> <br />Simplified flow diagram for studying the effects <br />of management options on the quality and <br />quantity of i~~igation ~etUrn flows. <br /> <br />Flow schematic for one unit of irrigation canal <br />water from its diversion to point of field <br />application. <br /> <br />Predicted outflow response for period 1970-1972 for <br />Management Alternatives 1 and 2 of a) water. b) <br />salt, and c) salinity concentrat,ion (TD5) to <br />lining of canals <br /> <br />Predicted outflow response for ~eriod 1970-i912 <br />for Management Alternative 3 of a) water, b) salt <br />c) salinity concentration (T05) to changing from <br />flood to sprinkler irrigation. , . , . , . , , . <br /> <br />Predicted outflow response for period 1970-1972 <br />for Management Alternative 4 of a) water, b) <br />salt, and c) salinity concentration (T08) to <br />changes in canal diversions while maintaining <br />the field application rate constant. <br /> <br />Predicted outflow response for period i970-1972 <br />for Management Alternative 5 of a) water, b) salt, <br />and c) salinity concentratIon (TDS) to changes in <br />canal diversions and lining of canals while main- <br />taining the field application rate constant. . . . <br /> <br />Predicted outflow response for period 1970-1972 <br />for Management Alternative 6 of a) water, b) salt, <br />c) salinity concentration (TDS) , and d) application <br />efficiency to changes in cannal diversions <br /> <br />Comparison of canal diversions for the period <br />1970-1972 for the Grand Valley, Colorado, area <br />between the base calibration and the best run <br />(# 36) from Management Alternative 6 <br /> <br />Predicted outflow response for period i970-1972 <br />for Management Alternative 7 of a) water, b) salt, <br />c) salinity (TDS) and d) application efficiency <br />to changes in canal diversions and EAP . . . . . . <br /> <br />vi ii <br /> <br />Page <br /> <br />49 <br /> <br />52 <br /> <br />53 <br /> <br />54 <br /> <br />56 <br /> <br />57 <br /> <br />59 <br /> <br />61 <br /> <br />63 <br /> <br />64 <br /> <br />65 <br /> <br />67 <br /> <br />68 <br />