Laserfiche WebLink
<br />001800 <br />16 <br /> <br />THE LOWER COLORADO RIVER BASIN PROJECT <br /> <br />and archaeologic objects and wildlife on lands withdrawn or acquired <br />for the development of units of the project. <br />The costs of works covered by this section, the allocation of costs <br />among the various project purposes, the benefit-cost ratios of the prin- <br />cipal works and repayment data oil these works are presented after <br />the discussion of section II later in this report. <br /> <br />Seetion 105 <br /> <br />, Section 105 provides that except as otherwise provided in this act, <br />the. Secretary shall be governed by the Federal reclamation laws. <br />Section 105(c)(1) provides that the Secretary may require that <br />water furnished by the Central Arizona unit shall not be used for the <br />irrigation of lands not having a recent irrigation history, and that its <br />U$e be !wcompanied by recognized conservation measures to protect <br />against losses III transmission. It also gives the Secretary authority to <br />shift water no longer needed for irrigation uses to municipal uses. <br />These provisions emphasize the fact that the Central Arizona unit will <br />provide a supplemental supply for the existing irrigation economy <br />rather tb,an serve as a means of expanding that economy. <br />Section 105(d)(2) is a statement of the manner in which the Secre- <br />tary may exercise the authority to contract delegated by section 9(e) <br />ofthe'Reclamation Project Act of 1939. <br />Section 105(c)(3) is an implementation of the policy of encourag- <br />ing exchanges of water;. the use of exchanges of water supplies as a <br />means of avoiding water rights problems has been successfully em- <br />ployed throughout the West. The Central Valley project in Cali- <br />fornia is a conspicuous example. Water users are concerned with <br />quantity, quality, dependability, and cost of their water supplies, not <br />with the sourceof the supply. This fact makes it possible to extend <br />s,ervice to areas that would not otherwise receive a water supply from <br />the project and to effect service in the most efficient and least costly <br />manner. <br /> <br />Section 106 <br /> <br />Se~~ionl06!~ovides .that the costs shall be allocated to irrig!1tio!1, <br />mUnICIpal, an llldustrlal water supply, and to power generatIOn ill <br />acc6rdancewith the reclamation laws, These reimbursable costs are <br />to be repaid ~. 50 years plus any development period authorized .by <br />law. See sectIOns 102(e)(1) and 102(e)(2).The repayment perIod <br />is 'the same as that provided in section 40fthe Colorado River Storage <br />Project Act. . . . <br />. Relevant data on allocation of project costs and repayment require- <br />ments are presented in section II later in this report. . <br /> <br />Section 107. <br /> <br />. Section 107 provides that the costs of irrigation of Indian lands that <br />cannot be paid ~ such lands shall be borne by the Nation, Section 4 <br />of the Colorado River Storage Project Act contains a similar provision. <br /> <br />Section 108 <br /> <br />Section 108 is the type of provision which has been used for some 50 <br />years'to indicate that actS such as the instant one are not intended to <br />ope'r!1te as implied repeals of the portion of the reclamation laws not <br />speCIfically affected. <br /> <br /> <br />:',>" <br /> <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />.; , <br /> <br />;". <br /> <br /> <br />. ".' '. .:~ <br />