Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br /> <br />0568 <br /> <br />Effects - <br />The combination of irrigation enduring practices along with the <br />management practices will facilitate the best water application of any <br />of the alternatives. The deep percolation would be reduced by 40%. <br />Irrigation induced erosion would be reduced by 88%. This alternative <br />provides the greatest reduction of irrigation induced erosion of any of <br />the alternatives. A significantly greater degree of improvement in the <br />surface and ground water quality would be achieved over previously <br />mentioned alternatives. <br /> <br />Appendix C contains information regarding the methodology used in the <br />alternative evaluations. A primary concern of Kansas and Colorado is <br />that this project should not adversely affect the Arkansas River <br />Compact. The project will not reduce the amount of water that is to be <br />available in the Arkansas River system for Kansas. Appendix C contains <br />information to support this fact. In summary, NRCS methodology for <br />predicting water utilization is based on individual field analysis <br />models. The models suggest that crop consumpcive use will not change <br />as a result of the project actions. Irrigation efficiency will be <br />increased from 29 percent to 50 percent, thereby making more effective <br />use of diverted surface water. Additional, there are approximately 40 <br />wells in the treated area, producing 5,600 acre feet per irrigation <br />season for supplemental irrigation water. The need to utilize these <br />wells will be reduced as a result of improved utilization of diverted <br />surface irrigation water. The estimated amount of reduced well water <br />needed for supplemental irrigation is based on the above mentioned <br />wells being used on 9,700 acres and a 60 percent participation level of <br />watershed clients. Support documentation is available upon request. <br /> <br />The total selenium concentration levels at the gage at Lamar will be <br />reduced from 19.7 micrograms/liter by approximately 17 percent through <br />project accion. A similar reduction will occur in the wells in the <br />irrigated area. Both will be reduced to within EPA standards. The <br />reduction will improve the quality downstream as well. Other heavy <br />metals, salts, and nutrients will be similarly reduced which have a <br />corresponding improvement in surface and ground water quality. <br /> <br />Selenium uptake by wetland plants along the river will be reduced, thus <br />benefiting wetlands and wildlife. The river's selenium level will be <br />reduced to within EPA and state standards. <br /> <br />The fishery habitat in the Arkansas River will be improved. This <br />should also improve the fishing potential. <br /> <br />Project implementation will cause a 32% reduction of nitrates <br />concentration in groundwater. <br /> <br />Project implementation will result in an 30% reduction of salts being <br />delivered to the Arkansas River. <br /> <br />Conservation tillage, use of Polyacrylamides (PAM) and or crop residue <br />use practices will reduce the irrigation induced erosion in the <br />watershed from 42 T/AC./YR. on the upper 1/3 of the fields to 5 <br />T/AC./YR. with alternative implementation. This will also reduce the <br /> <br />30 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />