Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />thus proJl~~~ a similar <br />the area. <br /> <br />impact on the social economic conditions in <br /> <br />The known cultural resources in the area would not be impacted. <br /> <br />In analyzing the beneficial effects to the project area and off-site, <br />it is necessary to make every effort to address the sponsors concerns. <br />These concerns include protection of the water resource from pollution, <br />protection of the soil resource from irrigation induced erosion and <br />effective irrigation water application. Irrigation water management <br />is an essential component in addressing these concerns. However, the <br />on-farm irrigation water conveyance and application systems must also <br />be improved to achieve an adequate level of irrigation water <br />management. <br /> <br />The benefits previously mentioned are directly correlated to the degree <br />of irrigation water management attained in the project area. Sponsors <br />concerns and objectives cannot be met by management practices alone <br />even if cost shared. Meeting water quality standards could not be <br />reached with this alternative. The effects shown in the summary and <br />comparison of the candidate plans in Table D used a 20% participation <br />level by farmers. <br /> <br />Sponsors and farmers input was also obtained on a participation rate <br />that would actually occur if technical assistance were available with <br />out cost sharing management practices. It was their opinion that due <br />to the risk and uncertainty of applying just management practices, the <br />participation rate would actually be in 20-25% range. The benefits <br />derived from this alternative were therefore be proportionally reduced. <br /> <br />Alternative 3. Management Plus Enduring Irrigation System Improvements <br />(NED and recommended plan) <br /> <br />149,610 Feet of concrete ditch lining, <br />213,710 Feet of irrigation pipeline, <br />Mitigation practices including (10 multi-purpose ponds and 20 acres of <br />wetland development), <br />3,300 Acres of land leveling, <br />56 Water control structures, and appurtenances, for irrigation <br />pipeline and lined ditch systems, <br />Management practices which include; 26,700 acres of nutrient <br />management, B,BOO acres of conservation tillage, crop residue use, <br />and polyacrylamides; 26,700 acres of pest management and 26,700 <br />acres of irrigation water management. <br /> <br />Costs - Total Project <br />PL - 566 <br />Other <br /> <br />$5,326,000 <br />$3,056,500 <br />$2,269,500 <br /> <br />See Table 1 for further cost breakdown and Appendix B for map of area <br />to be treated. <br /> <br />29 <br />