My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP11664
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
11000-11999
>
WSP11664
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 3:18:26 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 5:06:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.128.J
Description
Silt Project
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
8/1/1961
Title
Report of the Reappraisal of Direct Agricultural Benefits and Project Impacts - Silt Project-Colorado - Part 1 of 2
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />"'::l" <br />f'- <br />C"j <br /> <br />Relationship of the Silt Project to <br />National Forest Lands <br /> <br />The Silt project features and project lands are all outside the exterior <br />boundary of the White River National Foresto As far as can be foreseen, <br />the project will not impair or affect any existing facility or service on <br />national forest lands. <br /> <br />Relationship of Watershed Conditions <br />to the Sll t Pro,iect <br /> <br />The watershed area of the Sll t project comprises about 175 square miles. <br />It consists of the East, Middle and West Rifle Creek drainages, plus the <br />drainage area of the lands lying south of the Grand Hogback and the west <br />portion of Dry Elk Valley north of HaJ'nc>y Gap Reservoir. Sixty-three per- <br />cent of the lands in the watershed are owned by the Federal Government, <br />wIth the remaining 37 percent being in private and State ownership. <br /> <br />Watershed problems consist largely of: (1) silt and sedIment production <br />from the Mancos shale areas above the Rifle Gap Reservoir; (2) denuded <br />watershed lands due to improper grazing practices and loss of protective <br />cover by fire; (3) abandoned beaver dams, which break and contribute sedi- <br />ment to stream flows; and (4) local flood water and sediment damage to irri- <br />gation canals and systems foltcwhg thunderstorms and rapid snow"'filelt runoff <br />on erosive type soils and steep and sparsely vegetated slopes. <br /> <br />No large flood control structures are recommended. The high and intermediate <br />elevation zones pose no flood problems to the project. Flood control struc- <br />tures will be ineffectual in the lower elevation zones due to steep slopes, <br />raw soils and sparse vegetation. Critical areas do exist and their harmful <br />effects can be lessened by improved management such as fencing, revegetation <br />and restricted grazing. Canal or ditch designs should provide protection <br />for runoff from these lower elevation areas. Individual floods will be <br />small due to short slopes and low rainfall but the cumulative effects of <br />these events creates a need for corrective measures. <br /> <br />Sediment production can be reduced by the application of land treatment <br />measures to watershed lands. Improved watershed conditions wlll r.educe <br />ditch and canal operation and maintenance cost. Establishment of land <br />treatment measures on problem areas will also reduce sediment carried by <br />streams and extend the useful life of the reservoirs. <br /> <br />Needed watershed treatment can be accomplished and would be justified under <br />programs of Federal land administering agencies and by private land owners <br />with assistance normally furnished by Federal and State agencies through <br />Soil Conservation Districts and otherwise. <br /> <br />vi <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.