Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Page <br /> <br />C. WRC's Analysis and Determination of the <br />P roj ect Y i e 1 d <br />1. Approach 1 / Simulation of the Historic <br />Operation of the River System <br />2. Approach 2 / Simulation of the River System <br />-Under Different Operating Conditions <br />3. Approach 3 / Deduction of Project Yield from <br />DWR&PDA Study <br /> <br />30 <br /> <br />31 <br />32 <br />41 <br /> <br />IV. HYDRAULIC DESIGN <br /> <br />A. Introduction <br /> <br />52 <br />52 <br /> <br />B. Design Capacity <br />C. Sizing of the Aqueduct <br /> <br />52 <br /> <br />54 <br /> <br />V. RECONNAISSANCE LEVEL GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION <br /> <br />61 <br /> <br />A. Introduction <br /> <br />61 <br /> <br />B. Geology of the Project Area <br />1. Geology of Reservoir Site <br />2. Geology of Dam Site <br />3. Geology of Pressure Tunnels and <br />Powerhouse Area <br />4. Geology of Aqueduct Alignment <br />a. Jones Mountain Tunnel <br />b. Pipeline Between Tunnels <br />c. Trout Creek Tunnel <br />d. Pipeline to Antero Reservoir <br /> <br />C. Findings and Recommendations <br />1. Tunnels <br />2. Dam and Reservoir Sites <br /> <br />62 <br />62 <br />63 <br /> <br />63 <br />63 <br />64 <br />66 <br />67 <br />69 <br /> <br />69 <br />69 <br />71 <br /> <br />o. Conclusions <br /> <br />E. Literature Cited in this Section <br /> <br />73 <br />73 <br /> <br />VI. BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES <br /> <br />81 <br /> <br />A. Introduction <br /> <br />B. Purpose <br />C. Description of Study Site <br /> <br />31 <br />81 <br /> <br />D. i~ethods <br />1. Office Data Gathering <br />2. Field Data Gathering <br /> <br />32 <br /> <br />83 <br />83 <br />85 <br /> <br />i i <br />